Guangjun Yu
Author directory2026
ShizhenGPT: Towards Multimodal LLMs for Traditional Chinese Medicine
Junying Chen | Zhenyang Cai | Zhiheng Liu | Yunjin Yang | Rongsheng Wang | Qingying Xiao | Xiangyi Feng | Zhan Su | Jing Guo | Xiang Wan | Guangjun Yu | Haizhou Li | Benyou Wang
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Junying Chen | Zhenyang Cai | Zhiheng Liu | Yunjin Yang | Rongsheng Wang | Qingying Xiao | Xiangyi Feng | Zhan Su | Jing Guo | Xiang Wan | Guangjun Yu | Haizhou Li | Benyou Wang
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Despite the success of large language models (LLMs), their potential in **Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)** remains underexplored due to scarce high-quality data and the multimodal nature of TCM diagnostics, which involve looking, listening, smelling, and pulse-taking. These modalities challenge conventional LLMs. To address these challenges, we present **ShizhenGPT**, the first multimodal LLM tailored for TCM. To overcome data scarcity, we curate the largest TCM dataset to date, comprising 100GB+ of text and 200GB+ of multimodal data, including 1.2M images, 200 hours of audio, and physiological signals. ShizhenGPT is pretrained and instruction-tuned to achieve deep TCM knowledge and multimodal reasoning. For evaluation, we collect recent national TCM qualification exams and build a visual benchmark for Medicinal Recognition and Visual Diagnosis. Experiments demonstrate that ShizhenGPT outperforms comparable-scale LLMs and competes with larger proprietary models. Moreover, it leads in TCM visual understanding among existing multimodal LLMs and shows promising results across modalities such as sound, pulse, electronic-nose signals, and vision, paving the way toward more holistic multimodal perception in TCM. We hope that the datasets, models, and methods of this work will inspire further exploration in this field. Code, models, and released data are available at https://github.com/FreedomIntelligence/ShizhenGPT.
PrinciplismQA: A Philosophy-Grounded Approach to Assessing LLM-Human Clinical Medical Ethics Alignment
Chang Hong | Minghao Wu | Qingying Xiao | Yuchi Wang | Xiang Wan | Guangjun Yu | Benyou Wang | Yan Hu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Chang Hong | Minghao Wu | Qingying Xiao | Yuchi Wang | Xiang Wan | Guangjun Yu | Benyou Wang | Yan Hu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
As medical LLMs transition to clinical deployment, assessing their ethical reasoning capability becomes critical. While achieving high accuracy on knowledge benchmarks, LLMs lack validated assessment for navigating ethical trade-offs in clinical decision-making where multiple valid solutions exist. Existing benchmarks lack systematic approaches to incorporate recognized philosophical frameworks and expert validation for ethical reasoning assessment. We introduce PrinciplismQA, a philosophy-grounded approach to assessing LLM clinical medical ethics alignment. Grounded in Principlism, our approach provides a systematic methodology for incorporating clinical ethics philosophy into LLM assessment design. PrinciplismQA comprises 3,648 expert-validated questions spanning knowledge assessment and clinical reasoning. Our expert-calibrated pipeline enables reproducible evaluation and models ethical biases. Evaluating recent models reveals significant ethical reasoning gaps despite high knowledge accuracy, demonstrating that knowledge-oriented training does not ensure clinical ethical alignment. PrinciplismQA provides a validated tool for assessing clinical AI deployment readiness.