In pointwise document reranking, Chain-of-Thought models typically underperform direct scoring models. While existing diagnostics attribute this to inferior classification, score polarization, or calibration breakdown, whether targeted training can bridge this gap remains unclear. Our empirical study first confirms that this gap is stable across scales up to 32B parameters, ruling out model and data capacity confounders. We then apply stress tests utilizing reinforcement learning, fine-grained supervision, and architectural decoupling to explicitly repair these deviations. Although these interventions improve classification accuracy and absolute scores, the relative ranking gap persists. These findings suggest that, within the pointwise scoring paradigm, routing continuous relevance semantics through discrete text constrains ranking signal resolution, revealing a bottleneck that is stable and difficult to overcome under current standard methods, rather than an easily resolvable training bias.

In the RAG paradigm, document ranking determines the evidence available to downstream generators. Through controlled analysis, we identify two phenomena underexplored by existing rankers: (i) downstream response quality depends not only on relevance but also on the composition and ordering of selected documents, and (ii) such preferences differ systematically across generators. However, existing rankers are trained purely on query–document relevance, leaving both phenomena unmodeled. To close this gap, we construct PRISM, a bilingual preference-aligned dataset built through a four-stage pipeline that compresses the combinatorial subset-and-ordering space by roughly four orders of magnitude and produces response-quality preference supervision conditioned on seven downstream generators. On a 13k-query subset of PRISM, we train Rank4Gen, a generator-aware ranker that performs joint document set selection and ordering. Experiments on five challenging RAG benchmarks show that Rank4Gen improves downstream QA quality on most evaluated generators, with per-generator F1 gains of up to +2.08 over the strongest set-selection baseline. Code is available at https://github.com/JOHNNY-fans/Rank4Gen.

Real-world image search queries are multimodal and compositional: “find this shirt in pink” specifies an entity to retain, an attribute to modify, and context to ignore. Yet existing re-rankers either compress such multi-faceted relevance into an opaque embedding or rely on free-form chain-of-thought that easily omits or hallucinates fine-grained constraints. Drawing on rubric- and checklist-based evaluation from NLP, we recast multimodal image re-ranking as a semantic constraint satisfaction problem and propose EviRank, which parses any query—text-only, image-only, or composed—into a unified evidence package: typed criteria across six semantic slots (e.g., entities, attributes, relations), each labelled required, forbidden, or ignorable. Re-ranking then reduces to evidence-conditioned verification, combining deterministic rubric scoring and evidence-grounded listwise comparison in a single training-free procedure. The explicit evidence can further serve as structured supervision for optionally distilling a lightweight student. Across five benchmarks spanning text-to-image, image-to-image, and composed image retrieval, EviRank achieves state-of-the-art performance, and the distilled student preserves over 90% of the teacher’s capability at substantially lower cost.

Large vision-language models used as listwise rerankers must jointly process visual tokens from tens of candidates per query, making token pruning essential for practical deployment. Existing pruning methods retain tokens by attention saliency, yet we show that saliency is systematically misaligned with ranking contribution: visually prominent tokens often capture order-neutral patterns shared across candidates. This mismatch is layer-dependent: saliency becomes informative only where attention is concentrated, and normalized attention entropy diagnoses the reliability shift (Pearson r=0.87). We propose RaDiCal (Rank-Discriminative Calibration), a training-free framework that uses normalized attention entropy to decide when saliency can be trusted, fusing it with an attention-free rank discriminative prior and se-lecting pruning layers from the same trust landscape. Across three retrieval benchmarks and multiple VLM architectures, RaDiCal matches Dense MRR@10 on Flickr30K and surpasses it on MSCOCO at a 20% token budget, ranks first among all pruning methods on FashionIQ, and holds within 1.2 pp on Flickr30K and MSCOCO at 10% retention. It cuts FLOPs by 39–45% and delivers 1.28–1.45× measured speedups across two VLM architectures without dataset-specific retuning.

Vision-language retrieval with CLIP-style dual encoders achieves strong cross-modal performance, yet practical accuracy often hinges on localized semantic distinctions where top-ranked near misses differ from the true match by a single critical detail. Hard-sample mining can select confusable candidates but cannot construct corrected counterparts; synthetic augmentation can generate novel samples but, without conditioning on actual model failures, targets irrelevant dimensions of hardness. We observe that a top-ranked false positive is a counterfactual scaffold—sharing most of the query’s semantics while differing in a localized failure-causing residual. Minimally correcting this residual yields a hard positive of the ground truth in the same modality; the corrected and unedited versions form a hard negative pair that straddles the decision boundary, producing complementary pull–push supervision. We introduce RePair, guided by three principles—Validity, Minimality, and Locality—which mines false positives bidirectionally, applies LLM-guided counterfactual editing, and trains with a local hard-pair contrastive objective. On Flickr30K and COCO30K, RePair outperforms controlled augmentation baselines with only 107K synthetic samples—26%–75% fewer than comparable methods—confirming failure-conditioned repair is more data-efficient than error-agnostic augmentation.

Chinese Search Query Spell Correction is a task designed to autonomously identify and correct typographical errors within queries in the search engine. Despite the availability of comprehensive datasets like Microsoft Speller and Webis, their monolingual nature and limited scope pose significant challenges in evaluating modern pre-trained language models such as BERT and GPT. To address this, we introduce QSpell 250K, a large-scale benchmark specifically developed for Chinese Query Spelling Correction. QSpell 250K offers several advantages: 1) It contains over 250K samples, which is ten times more than previous datasets. 2) It covers a broad range of topics, from formal entities to everyday colloquialisms and idiomatic expressions. 3) It includes both Chinese and English, addressing the complexities of code-switching. Each query undergoes three rounds of high-fidelity annotation to ensure accuracy. Our extensive testing across three popular models demonstrates that QSpell 250K effectively evaluates the efficacy of representative spelling correctors. We believe that QSpell 250K will significantly advance spelling correction methodologies. The accompanying data and code will be made publicly available.

Recent studies have highlighted the significant potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) as zero-shot relevance rankers. These methods predominantly utilize prompt learning to assess the relevance between queries and documents by generating a ranked list of potential documents. Despite their promise, the substantial costs associated with LLMs pose a significant challenge for their direct implementation in commercial search systems. To overcome this barrier and fully exploit the capabilities of LLMs for text ranking, we explore techniques to transfer the ranking expertise of LLMs to a more compact model similar to BERT, using a ranking loss to enable the deployment of less resource-intensive models. Specifically, we enhance the training of LLMs through Continued Pre-Training, taking the query as input and the clicked title and summary as output. We then proceed with supervised fine-tuning of the LLM using a rank loss, assigning the final token as a representative of the entire sentence. Given the inherent characteristics of autoregressive language models, only the final token </s> can encapsulate all preceding tokens. Additionally, we introduce a hybrid point-wise and margin MSE loss to transfer the ranking knowledge from LLMs to smaller models like BERT. This method creates a viable solution for environments with strict resource constraints. Both offline and online evaluations have confirmed the efficacy of our approach, and our model has been successfully integrated into a commercial web search engine as of February 2024.

Fine-grained entity typing (FET) aims to deduce specific semantic types of the entity mentions in the text. Modern methods for FET mainly focus on learning what a certain type looks like. And few works directly model the type differences, that is, let models know the extent that which one type is different from others. To alleviate this problem, we propose a type-enriched hierarchical contrastive strategy for FET. Our method can directly model the differences between hierarchical types and improve the ability to distinguish multi-grained similar types. On the one hand, we embed type into entity contexts to make type information directly perceptible. On the other hand, we design a constrained contrastive strategy on the hierarchical structure to directly model the type differences, which can simultaneously perceive the distinguishability between types at different granularity. Experimental results on three benchmarks, BBN, OntoNotes, and FIGER show that our method achieves significant performance on FET by effectively modeling type differences.