Data critical to real-world decision-making is increasingly found within organizations. Such data is heterogeneous, constantly evolving, and only imperfectly captured. However, current data management systems remain largely passive, retrieving what is explicitly stored while offering limited support for uncovering implicit structure or reasoning under noise, incompleteness, and continuous updates. We argue that next-generation data management requires neural capabilities, which can uncover complex latent relationships, distinguish reliable signals from noise, and remain consistent as the underlying data state evolves. To support this direction, we introduce NGDBench, a benchmark across five domains that unifies structured and unstructured sources. NGDBench adopts a graph view because graphs provide a flexible abstraction for modeling complex systems, capturing latent relationships, and subsuming structured formats such as relational tables. Each instance pairs a clean latent graph with a realistically perturbed observed graph. NGDBench supports full Cypher queries and dynamic data management operations. Evaluations of state-of-the-art Text-to-Cypher by LLMs and GraphRAG pipelines reveal that current methods remain sensitive to noise and struggle with dynamic state tracking, highlighting the need for resilient, inference-capable data management. Our code is available at https://github.com/HKUST-KnowComp/NGDBench.

Long-horizon LLM agents typically choose from an environment-enumerated list of grounded actions (Planning with Actions, PwA). While this interface reduces formatting risk, scaling the list increases screening load and can bottleneck planning. We study Planning with Schemas (PwS), which replaces action enumeration with a small set of action templates that the agent instantiates into executable actions. We introduce a cognitive-bandwidth perspective of this trade-off and quantify screening vs. instantiation pressure using context length proxy and failure actions proxy. Across four interactive environments, we identify an inflection point: PwA excels at small interfaces but degrades as action lists grow, whereas PwS becomes increasingly competitive and often superior. A distractor-injection stress test reproduces the PwA drop by enlarging the action space alone, isolating screening load and highlighting schema instantiation as the key remaining bottleneck.

We present AutoSchemaKG, a framework for fully autonomous knowledge graph construction that eliminates the need for predefined schemas. Our system leverages large language models to simultaneously extract knowledge triples and induce comprehensive schemas directly from text, modeling both entities and events while employing conceptualization to organize instances into semantic categories. Processing over 50 million documents, we construct ATLAS (Automated Triple Linking And Schema induction), a family of knowledge graphs with 900+ million nodes and 5.9 billion edges. This approach outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on multi-hop QA tasks and enhances LLM factuality. Notably, our schema induction achieves 92% semantic alignment with human-crafted schemas with zero manual intervention, demonstrating that billion-scale knowledge graphs with dynamically induced schemas can effectively complement parametric knowledge in large language models.

Individuals’ concerns about data privacy and AI safety are highly contextualized and extend beyond sensitive patterns. Addressing these issues requires reasoning about the context to identify and mitigate potential risks. Though researchers have widely explored using large language models (LLMs) as evaluators for contextualized safety and privacy assessments, these efforts typically assume the availability of complete and clear context, whereas real-world contexts tend to be ambiguous and incomplete. In this paper, we propose ContextLens, a semi-rule-based framework that leverages LLMs to ground the input context in the legal domain and explicitly identify both known and unknown factors for legal compliance. Instead of directly assessing safety outcomes, our ContextLens instructs LLMs to answer a set of crafted questions that span over applicability, general principles and detailed provisions to assess compliance with pre-defined priorities and rules. We conduct extensive experiments on existing compliance benchmarks that cover the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the EU AI Act. The results suggest that our ContextLens can significantly improve LLMs’ compliance assessment and surpass existing baselines without any training. Additionally, our ContextLens can further identify the ambiguous and missing factors.

Building effective knowledge graphs (KGs) for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is pivotal for advancing question answering (QA) systems. However, its effectiveness is hindered by a fundamental disconnect: the knowledge graph (KG) construction process is decoupled from its downstream application, yielding suboptimal graph structures. To bridge this gap, we introduce AutoGraph-R1, the first framework to directly optimize KG construction for task performance using Reinforcement Learning (RL). AutoGraph-R1 trains an LLM constructor by framing graph generation as a policy learning problem, where the reward is derived from the graph’s functional utility in a RAG pipeline. We design two novel, task-aware reward functions, one for graphs as knowledge carriers and another as knowledge indices. Across multiple QA benchmarks, AutoGraph-R1 consistently enables graph RAG methods to achieve significant performance gains over using task-agnostic baseline graphs. Our work shows it is possible to close the loop between construction and application, shifting the paradigm from building intrinsically ‘good‘ graphs to building demonstrably ‘useful‘ ones.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are catalyzing a paradigm shift in scientific discovery, evolving from task-specific automation tools into increasingly autonomous agents and fundamentally redefining research processes and human-AI collaboration. This survey systematically charts this burgeoning field, placing a central focus on the changing roles and escalating capabilities of LLMs in science. Through the lens of the scientific method, we introduce a foundational three-level taxonomy—Tool, Analyst, and Scientist—to delineate their escalating autonomy and evolving responsibilities within the research lifecycle. We further identify pivotal challenges and future research trajectories such as robotic automation, self-improvement, and ethical governance. Overall, this survey provides a conceptual architecture and strategic foresight to navigate and shape the future of AI-driven scientific discovery, fostering both rapid innovation and responsible advancement.