Large language models (LLMs) are typically evaluated on static benchmarks, even though natural language constantly evolves through newly emerging words and meanings. Existing Korean benchmarks are centered on established vocabulary and therefore provide limited coverage of such recent lexical change, and their English-oriented design makes it difficult to assess the typological properties of Korean, in which content words combine productively with functional morphemes. In this paper, we introduce **KoNeoBench**, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs’ understanding of Korean neologisms. KoNeoBench is built on 1,785 Korean neologisms attested in online news since 2020 and curated through expert lexicographic review. Each entry provides usage examples, word-formation analyses, and dictionary-style definitions. Based on this resource, we define four tasks and report results on recent models, together with a human baseline. Our experiments show that current LLMs exhibit clear limitations in recovering source components, distinguishing semantic categories, and generating accurate definitions. These results reveal specific aspects of recent Korean lexical change that remain challenging for current LLMs. KoNeoBench is available at https://github.com/bcmilab/ko-neobench/ .

This paper examines how well visual language models (VLMs) understand video question answering (VideoQA) tasks and generate responses accordingly. Recently, VLMs based on Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance, but the processes of understanding and reasoning in VLMs remain under-explored. To tackle this challenge, we propose Video Understanding and Response Consistency Assessment, VURCA, a framework that incorporates a fine-grained question generation and answering process to measure how well the responses generated by VLMs align with what the model understands. In addition, we introduce an extended benchmark dataset, FgNExT-QA, which builds upon NExT-QA by incorporating more fine-grained VideoQA tasks. FgNExT-QA is designed to evaluate fine-grained understanding in video question answering. Through experiments, we found that despite the strong overall QA performance of VLMs, their understanding of both the video content and the question remains limited. In particular, they exhibit poor video comprehension in fine-grained VideoQA tasks.