Australian law permits the use of copyright material in certain circumstances to facilitate access by people with disabilities. These consumers are increasingly turning to accessibility software incorporating AI/ML systems for text simplification, semantic search and website navigation. Despite the remarkable growth of AI/ML use by people with disabilities, legal information providers may forbid or block these methods. We examine the position of AustLII on AI within the Australian legal-policy environment and its implications for inclusive access to justice. Comparable entities within the global Free Access to Law Movement face similar pressures: our analysis may provide insights beyond the Australian context. The case study is illustrative of a larger unresolved tension between copyright, contract and accessibility as AI technologies proliferate alongside countermeasures intended to restrict them. We argue emerging mechanisms to authenticate assistive technology agents, and scope their purposes, can begin to reconcile various conflicting legitimate interests.