While text-based hallucination detection is well studied, reference-free detection of factual alterations in speech remains underexplored, especially for low-resource languages. Our spoken benchmark comprises 12,013 English, Russian, and Kazakh news samples with three synthetic alteration types and three severity levels, pairing source articles with rewrites as text, synthesized audio, and ASR transcripts. We add 290 fact-checked misinformation items collected in Russian (225) and Kazakh (65), translated into the other language and rendered through the same TTS–ASR pipeline. We evaluate fine-tuned multilingual encoders and zero-shot multimodal decoders on text, transcripts, and audio. Detectors receive only target inputs without source articles or external evidence; the task evaluates reference-free classification rather than evidence-grounded verification. Encoder degradation from source text to transcripts generally tracks per-language ASR error on the binary task. Among decoders, only Gemma-3n exceeds the binary majority-class baseline in macro-F1, on transcripts only; the other four do not exceed their respective baselines. Comparisons between audio and transcripts are confounded by differences in evaluation coverage and class balance. Synthetic-trained detectors achieve 0.82–0.88 macro-F1 on real-world misinformation source text; Russian provenance analysis reveals veracity-related and model-dependent machine-style signals, a key confound in synthetic hallucination benchmarks.

Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of audio tasks. As they are increasingly deployed in real-world applications, ensuring their safety alignment has become more important. Although refusal mechanisms serve as a key safeguard by preventing LALMs from responding to harmful requests, they can also lead to over-refusal, where models incorrectly reject benign queries. This issue is especially challenging in the audio domain because speech that appears harmful in isolation may become benign when interpreted together with the surrounding acoustic context, such as background sounds. To study this problem, we introduce AOR-Bench (Audio Over-Refusal Benchmark), the first benchmark for over-refusal specifically designed for LALMs. AOR-Bench contains 3,000 pseudo-harmful audio samples across six scenario categories. Evaluating 12 representative LALMs from six major model families, we find that over-refusal is widespread and uncover several important patterns in their safety judgments. As a preliminary effort to mitigate this issue, we further explore two lightweight strategies (e.g., Chain-of-Thought prompting and activation steering) to reduce over-refusal.

Harmful content detectors—particularly disinformation classifiers—are predominantly developed and evaluated on Standard American English (), leaving their robustness to dialectal variation unexplored. We present , the first benchmark for evaluating disinformation detection robustness across 50 English dialects spanning U.S., British, African, Caribbean, and Asia-Pacific varieties. Using Multi-VALUE’s linguistically-grounded transformations, we introduce D-CUBE (Dialectal Disinformation Detection Corpus), a core corpus component of comprising 195K samples derived from established disinformation benchmarks. Our evaluation of 16 detection models reveals systematic vulnerabilities: human-written dialectal content degrades detection by 1.4–3.6% F1, while AI-generated content remains stable. Fine-tuned transformers substantially outperform zero-shot LLMs (96.6% vs. 78.3% best-case F1), with some models exhibiting catastrophic failures exceeding 33% degradation on mixed content. Cross-dialectal transfer analysis across 2,450 dialect pairs shows that multilingual models (mDeBERTa: 97.2% average F1) generalize effectively, while monolingual models like RoBERTa and XLM-RoBERTa fail on dialectal inputs. These findings demonstrate that current disinformation detectors may systematically disadvantage hundreds of millions of non- speakers worldwide. We release the benchmark, including the , and evaluation tools.

The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has increased the volume of machine-generated texts (MGTs) and blurred text authorship in various domains. However, most existing MGT benchmarks include single-author texts (human-written and machine-generated). This conventional design fails to capture more practical multi-author scenarios, where the user refines the LLM response for natural flow, coherence, and factual correctness. Our paper introduces the Benchmark of Expert-edited Machine-generated Outputs (Beemo), which includes 6.5k texts written by humans, generated by ten instruction-finetuned LLMs, and edited by experts for various use cases, ranging from creative writing to summarization. Beemo additionally comprises 13.1k machine-generated and LLM-edited texts, allowing for diverse MGT detection evaluation across various edit types. We document Beemo’s creation protocol and present the results of benchmarking 33 configurations of MGT detectors in different experimental setups. We find that expert-based editing evades MGT detection, while LLM-edited texts are unlikely to be recognized as human-written. Beemo and all materials are publicly available.

In-context learning (ICL) effectively conditions large language models (LLMs) for molecular tasks, such as property prediction and molecule captioning, by embedding carefully selected demonstration examples into the input prompt. This approach eliminates the computational overhead of extensive pre-training and fine-tuning. However, current prompt retrieval methods for molecular tasks rely on molecule feature similarity, such as Morgan fingerprints, which do not adequately capture the global molecular and atom-binding relationships. As a result, these methods fail to represent the full complexity of molecular structures during inference. Moreover, medium-sized LLMs, which offer simpler deployment requirements in specialized systems, have remained largely unexplored in the molecular ICL literature. To address these gaps, we propose a self-supervised learning technique, GAMIC (Graph-Aligned Molecular In-Context learning), which aligns global molecular structures, represented by graph neural networks (GNNs), with textual captions (descriptions) while leveraging local feature similarity through Morgan fingerprints. In addition, we introduce a Maximum Marginal Relevance (MMR) based diversity heuristic during retrieval to optimize input prompt demonstration samples. Our experimental findings using diverse benchmark datasets show GAMIC outperforms simple Morgan-based ICL retrieval methods across all tasks by up to 45%. Our code is available at: https://github.com/aliwister/mol-icl.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have introduced paradigm-shifting approaches in natural language processing. Yet, their transformative in-context learning (ICL) capabilities remain underutilized, especially in customer service dialogue summarization—a domain plagued by generative hallucinations, detail omission, and inconsistencies. We present Chain-of-Interactions (CoI), a novel single-instance, multi-step framework that orchestrates information extraction, self-correction, and evaluation through sequential interactive generation chains. By strategically leveraging LLMs’ ICL capabilities through precisely engineered prompts, CoI dramatically enhances abstractive task-oriented dialogue summarization (ATODS) quality and usefulness. Our comprehensive evaluation on real-world and benchmark human-agent interaction datasets demonstrates CoI’s effectiveness through rigorous testing across 11 models and 7 prompting approaches, with 9 standard automatic evaluation metrics, 3 LLM-based evaluations, and human studies involving 480 evaluators across 9 quality dimensions. Results reveal CoI’s decisive superiority, outperforming all single-step approaches and achieving 6× better entity preservation, 49% higher quality scores, and 322% improvement in accuracy compared to state-of-the-art multi-step Chain-of-Density (CoD). This research addresses critical gaps in task-oriented dialogue summarization for customer service applications and establishes new standards for harnessing LLMs’ reasoning capabilities in practical, industry-relevant contexts.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in various NLP tasks, including semantic parsing, which translates natural language into formal code representations. However, the reverse operation, translating code into natural language, termed semantic captioning, has received less attention. This task is increasingly important as LLMs are integrated into platforms for code generation, security analysis, and educational purposes. In this paper, we focus on the captioning of SQL query (SQ2Text) to address the critical need for understanding and explaining SQL queries in an era where LLM-generated code poses potential security risks. We repurpose semantic parsing datasets for semantic captioning, specifically SQL2Text. To overcome the limited robustness of Text2SQL datasets for the reverse task, we introduce an iterative ICL prompt leveraging GPT-4o to generate multiple additional utterances. We conduct experiments across multiple in-context learning (ICL) methods, emphasizing smaller, more computationally efficient LLMs. Our findings demonstrate that leveraging the inherent graph properties of SQL for few-shot ICL sample selection significantly outperforms random selection by up to 39% on BLEU score and provides better results than alternative approaches. Dataset and codes are accessible.

High-quality text generation capability of latest Large Language Models (LLMs) causes concerns about their misuse (e.g., in massive generation/spread of disinformation). Machine-generated text (MGT) detection is important to cope with such threats. However, it is susceptible to authorship obfuscation (AO) methods, such as paraphrasing, which can cause MGTs to evade detection. So far, this was evaluated only in monolingual settings. Thus, the susceptibility of recently proposed multilingual detectors is still unknown. We fill this gap by comprehensively benchmarking the performance of 10 well-known AO methods, attacking 37 MGT detection methods against MGTs in 11 languages (i.e., 10 × 37 × 11 = 4,070 combinations). We also evaluate the effect of data augmentation on adversarial robustness using obfuscated texts. The results indicate that all tested AO methods can cause evasion of automated detection in all tested languages, where homoglyph attacks are especially successful. However, some of the AO methods severely damaged the text, making it no longer readable or easily recognizable by humans (e.g., changed language, weird characters).

Recent ubiquity and disruptive impacts of large language models (LLMs) have raised concerns about their potential to be misused (.i.e, generating large-scale harmful and misleading content). To combat this emerging risk of LLMs, we propose a novel “Fighting Fire with Fire” (F3) strategy that harnesses modern LLMs’ generative and emergent reasoning capabilities to counter human-written and LLM-generated disinformation. First, we leverage GPT-3.5-turbo to synthesize authentic and deceptive LLM-generated content through paraphrase-based and perturbation-based prefix-style prompts, respectively. Second, we apply zero-shot in-context semantic reasoning techniques with cloze-style prompts to discern genuine from deceptive posts and news articles. In our extensive experiments, we observe GPT-3.5-turbo’s zero-shot superiority for both in-distribution and out-of-distribution datasets, where GPT-3.5-turbo consistently achieved accuracy at 68-72%, unlike the decline observed in previous customized and fine-tuned disinformation detectors. Our codebase and dataset are available at https://github.com/mickeymst/F3.

There is a lack of research into capabilities of recent LLMs to generate convincing text in languages other than English and into performance of detectors of machine-generated text in multilingual settings. This is also reflected in the available benchmarks which lack authentic texts in languages other than English and predominantly cover older generators. To fill this gap, we introduce MULTITuDE, a novel benchmarking dataset for multilingual machine-generated text detection comprising of 74,081 authentic and machine-generated texts in 11 languages (ar, ca, cs, de, en, es, nl, pt, ru, uk, and zh) generated by 8 multilingual LLMs. Using this benchmark, we compare the performance of zero-shot (statistical and black-box) and fine-tuned detectors. Considering the multilinguality, we evaluate 1) how these detectors generalize to unseen languages (linguistically similar as well as dissimilar) and unseen LLMs and 2) whether the detectors improve their performance when trained on multiple languages.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created threats to global health control. Misinformation circulated on social media and news outlets has undermined public trust towards Government and health agencies. This problem is further exacerbated in developing countries or low-resource regions, where the news is not equipped with abundant English fact-checking information. In this paper, we make the first attempt to detect COVID-19 misinformation (in English, Spanish, and Haitian French) populated in the Caribbean regions, using the fact-checked claims in the US (in English). We started by collecting a dataset of Caribbean real & fake claims. Then we trained several classification and language models on COVID-19 in the high-resource language regions and transferred the knowledge to the Caribbean claim dataset. The experimental results of this paper reveal the limitations of current fake claim detection in low-resource regions and encourage further research on multi-lingual detection.