Jia Chen
Author directoryOther people with similar names: Jia Chen
Unverified author pages with similar names: Jia Chen
2026
LegalOne: A Family of Foundation Models for Reliable Legal Reasoning
Haitao Li | Yifan Chen | Shuo Miao | Qian Dong | Jia Chen | Yiran HU | Junjie Chen | Minghao Qin | Yueyue Wu | Yujia Zhou | Qingyao Ai | Yiqun Liu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Haitao Li | Yifan Chen | Shuo Miao | Qian Dong | Jia Chen | Yiran HU | Junjie Chen | Minghao Qin | Yueyue Wu | Yujia Zhou | Qingyao Ai | Yiqun Liu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive general capabilities, their direct application in the legal domain is often hindered by a lack of precise domain knowledge and complexity of performing rigorous multi-step judicial reasoning. To address this gap, we present LegalOne, a family of foundational models specifically tailored for the Chinese legal domain. LegalOne is developed through a comprehensive three-phase pipeline designed to master legal reasoning. First, during mid-training phase, we propose Plasticity-Adjusted Sampling (PAS) to address the challenge of domain adaptation. This perplexity-based scheduler strikes a balance between the acquisition of new knowledge and the retention of original capabilities, effectively establishing a robust legal foundation. Second, during supervised fine-tuning, we employ Legal Agentic CoT Distillation (LEAD) to distill explicit reasoning from raw legal texts. Unlike naive distillation, LEAD utilizes an agentic workflow to convert complex judicial processes into structured reasoning trajectories, thereby enforcing factual grounding and logical rigor. Finally, we implement a Curriculum Reinforcement Learning (RL) strategy. Through a progressive reinforcement process spanning memorization, understanding, and reasoning, LegalOne evolves from simple pattern matching to autonomous and reliable legal reasoning. Experimental results demonstrate that LegalOne achieves state-of-the-art performance across a wide range of legal tasks, surpassing general-purpose LLMs with vastly larger parameter counts through enhanced knowledge density and efficiency.
2025
SelfRACG: Enabling LLMs to Self-Express and Retrieve for Code Generation
Qian Dong | Jia Chen | Qingyao Ai | Hongning Wang | Haitao Li | Yiwu | Yao Hu | Yiqun Liu | Shaoping Ma
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Qian Dong | Jia Chen | Qingyao Ai | Hongning Wang | Haitao Li | Yiwu | Yao Hu | Yiqun Liu | Shaoping Ma
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Existing retrieval-augmented code generation (RACG) methods typically use an external retrieval module to fetch semantically similar code snippets used for generating subsequent fragments. However, even for consecutive code fragments, the content often diverges due to logical progression, resulting in a content gap. This gap undermines the performance of current RACG methods, as external retrieval modules based on content matching fail to infer the specific information need of LLMs to generate the next code fragment. Therefore, we propose SelfRACG, a novel paradigm that enables large language models (LLMs) to Self-express their information needs to enhance RACG. Specifically, SelfRACG includes an information need expression module and a two-stage information need-guided training strategy, which encourages LLMs to express their information need. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SelfRACG can retrieve external knowledge that better aligns with the LLM’s own information needs, resulting in superior generation performance compared to vanilla RACG. Moreover, both the training and deployment costs for retrieval in our framework are much lower than those of the strongest retrieval model.