Radiologists read CT as a sequential decision process, actively scrolling, zooming, adjusting windows, comparing with prior scans, and measuring structures, where each observation guides the next action. Current VLMs instead answer from passively sampled views, missing the multi-step reasoning that clinical reading demands. We address this by aligning the agent’s action space to the radiologists’ operations within the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), enabling active, multi-step CT reading with inherently transparent reasoning for clinical decision support. In particular, we build **ACTOR**, a unified framework comprising: (1) a PACS-like interactive CT environment with five radiologist-aligned tools; (2) **ActiveCTR-Bench**, spanning 7 tasks across a Perception–Interpretation–Reasoning hierarchy (7,112 items with visual ground truth and verified vision necessity); and (3) **ActiveCTReasoner**, a 7B model trained on 108K synthesized trajectories via SFT and reinforcement learning. ActiveCTReasoner achieves 73.2% close-ended accuracy, outperforming GPT-5.4 (47.3%) remarkably. In open-ended evaluations, it scores 44.2% compared to 23.8% for the best baseline. A radiologist collaboration study provides preliminary evidence for the decision-support utility of radiologist-aligned agentic reasoning.

High-quality math datasets are crucial for advancing the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, existing datasets often suffer from three key issues: outdated and insufficient challenging content, neglecting human-like reasoning, and limited reliability due to single-LLM generation.To address these, we introduce STORM-BORN, an ultra-challenging dataset of mathematical derivations sourced from cutting-edge academic papers, which includes dense human-like approximations and heuristic cues.To ensure the reliability and quality, we propose a novel human-in-the-loop, multi-agent data generation framework, integrating reasoning-dense filters, multi-agent collaboration, and human mathematicians’ evaluations. We curated a set of 2,000 synthetic samples and deliberately selected the 100 most difficult problems.Even most advanced models like GPT-o1 solved fewer than 5% of them. Fine-tuning on STORM-BORN boosts accuracy by 7.84% (LLaMA3-8B) and 9.12% (Qwen2.5-7B).As AI approaches mathematician-level reasoning, STORM-BORN provides both a high-difficulty benchmark and a human-like reasoning training resource. Our code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/lwhere/STORM-BORN.