Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown immense potential in improving the performance of large-scale models by effectively incorporating structured relational information. However, current approaches face two key challenges: (1) achieving robust semantic alignment between graph representations and large models, and (2) ensuring interpretability in the generated outputs. To address these challenges, we propose ExGLM (Explainable Graph Language Model), a novel training framework designed to seamlessly integrate graph and language modalities while enhancing transparency. Our framework introduces two core components: (1) a graph-language synergistic alignment module, which aligns graph structures with language model to ensure semantic consistency across modalities; and (2) a judge-and-improve paradigm, which allows the language model to iteratively evaluate, refine, and prioritize responses with higher interpretability, thereby improving both performance and transparency. Extensive experiments conducted on three benchmark datasets—ogbn-arxiv, Cora, and PubMed—demonstrate that ExGLM not only surpasses existing methods in efficiency but also generates outputs that are significantly more interpretable, effectively addressing the primary limitations of current approaches.

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) offers a promising approach to aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Typically, a reward model is trained or supplied to act as a proxy for humans in evaluating generated responses during the reinforcement training phase. However, current reward models operate as sequence-to-one models, allocating a single, sparse, and delayed reward to an entire output sequence. This approach may overlook the significant contributions of individual tokens toward the desired outcome. To this end, we propose a more fine-grained, token-level guidance approach for RL training. Specifically, we introduce RED, a novel REward reDistribition method that evaluates and assigns specific credit to each token using an off-the-shelf reward model. Utilizing these fine-grained rewards enhances the model’s understanding of language nuances, leading to more precise performance improvements. Notably, our method does not require modifying the reward model or introducing additional training steps, thereby incurring minimal computational costs. Experimental results across diverse datasets and tasks demonstrate the superiority of our approach.

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and AI-generated feedback (RLAIF) have become prominent techniques that significantly enhance the functionality of pre-trained language models (LMs). These methods harness feedback, sourced either from humans or AI, as direct rewards or to shape reward models that steer LM optimization. Nonetheless, the effective integration of rewards from diverse sources presents a significant challenge due to their disparate characteristics. To address this, recent research has developed algorithms incorporating strategies such as weighting, ranking, and constraining to handle this complexity. Despite these innovations, a bias toward disproportionately high rewards can still skew the reinforcement learning process and negatively impact LM performance. This paper explores a methodology for reward composition that enables simultaneous improvements in LMs across multiple dimensions. Inspired by fairness theory, we introduce a training algorithm that aims to reduce disparity and enhance stability among various rewards. Our method treats the aggregate reward as a dynamic weighted sum of individual rewards, with alternating updates to the weights and model parameters. For efficient and straightforward implementation, we employ an estimation technique rooted in the mirror descent method for weight updates, eliminating the need for gradient computations. The empirical results under various types of rewards across a wide range of scenarios demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.