LLMs’ performance on machine translation (MT) tasks is often dependent on the data availability in the specific domains and language pairs that they are trained upon. To examine if multiword expressions (MWEs) still present a bottleneck for LLMs regarding language understanding and translation, we report the performance of systems from the WMT 2026 Test Suites shared task, using portions of the publicly available multilingual parallel corpus AlphaMWE as test suites. We received 31 MT systems’ outputs covering English to Chinese (zh), Polish (pl), German (de), and Arabic (ar) including Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and two dialectal ones (Egyptian and Tunisian Arabic). We carried out automatic evaluations using BLEU, ChrF, and BERT-score to select the top 3 systems per language pair, followed up with human evaluations on the selected systems. Our findings show that figurative and MWE-related phenomena remain challenging for contemporary MT systems, automatic metrics sometimes disagree in system ranking, and human evaluation uncovers language-specific errors that remain hidden by aggregate scores. Inter-annotator analysis further reveals challenges in consistently identifying and calibrating linguistically subtle translation errors, highlighting the need for explicit evaluation guidelines and careful annotator calibration.

We introduce LM-Lexicon, an innovative definition modeling approach that incorporates data clustering, semantic expert learning, and model merging using a sparse mixture-of-experts architecture. By decomposing the definition modeling task into specialized semantic domains, where small language models are trained as domain experts, LM-Lexicon achieves substantial improvements (+7% BLEU score compared with the prior state-of-the-art model) over existing methods on five widely used benchmarks. Empirically, we demonstrate that 1) the clustering strategy enables fine-grained expert specialization with nearly 10% improvement in definition quality; 2) the semantic-aware domain-level routing mechanism achieves higher expert efficacy (+1%) than conventional token-level routing; and 3) further performance gains can be obtained through test-time compute and semantic expert scaling. Our work advances definition modeling while providing insights into the development of efficient language models for semantic-intensive applications.

Large Language Models (LLMs) often suffer from “Reasoning Collapse” on challenging mathematical reasoning tasks, where stochastic sampling produces lexical variations of the same erroneous logic rather than genuine semantic exploration. We observe that failed reasoning traces are often associated with a low-rank bias manifold in the model’s hidden-state geometry, which reduces exploration toward corrective solution directions. To address this, we propose Spectral Orthogonal Exploration (SOE), a geometric inference framework under a “Student Guides Teacher” paradigm. Instead of using a weak auxiliary agent for imitation, SOE uses it as an orthogonal probe to introduce semantically heterogeneous reasoning signals into the teacher’s orthogonal complement of its dominant subspace. This intervention steers the teacher toward more diverse reasoning trajectories and improves exploration beyond standard sampling. Experiments on mathematical benchmarks show that SOE improves average accuracy by 62.4% and average sampling efficiency by 113.7% over baseline methods, suggesting that geometric interventions can be effective for mitigating reasoning collapse in mathematical reasoning. We further provide preliminary evidence that SOE is also effective on logic and code generation benchmarks. Code is available at https://github.com/dayuwang401/spectral-orthogonal-exploration.

Machine reading comprehension (MRC) that requires discrete reasoning involving symbolic operations, e.g., addition, sorting, and counting, is a challenging task. According to this nature, semantic parsing-based methods predict interpretable but complex logical forms. However, logical form generation is nontrivial and even a little perturbation in a logical form will lead to wrong answers. To alleviate this issue, multi-predictor -based methods are proposed to directly predict different types of answers and achieve improvements. However, they ignore the utilization of symbolic operations and encounter a lack of reasoning ability and interpretability. To inherit the advantages of these two types of methods, we propose OPERA, an operation-pivoted discrete reasoning framework, where lightweight symbolic operations (compared with logical forms) as neural modules are utilized to facilitate the reasoning ability and interpretability. Specifically, operations are first selected and then softly executed to simulate the answer reasoning procedure. Extensive experiments on both DROP and RACENum datasets show the reasoning ability of OPERA. Moreover, further analysis verifies its interpretability.