The dominant Fill-in-the-Middle (FIM) paradigm for code completion is constrained by its rigid inability to correct contextual errors and reliance on unaligned, insecure Base models. While Chat LLMs offer safety and Agentic workflows provide flexibility, they suffer from performance degradation and prohibitive latency, respectively. To resolve this dilemma, we propose Search-and-Replace Infilling (SRI), a framework that internalizes the agentic verification-and-editing mechanism into a unified, single-pass inference process. By structurally grounding edits via an explicit search phase, SRI harmonizes completion tasks with the instruction-following priors of Chat LLMs, extending the paradigm from static infilling to dynamic context-aware editing. We synthesize a high-quality dataset, SRI-200K, and fine-tune the SRI-Coder series. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that with minimal data (20k samples), SRI-Coder enables Chat models to surpass the completion performance of their Base counterparts. Crucially, unlike FIM-style tuning, SRI preserves general coding competencies and maintains inference latency comparable to standard FIM. We release our dataset and models, establishing SRI as a robust, secure, and efficient alignment recipe for next-generation interactive development.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in code generation across various domains. However, their ability to replicate complex, multi-panel visualizations from real-world data remains largely unassessed. To address this gap, we introduce RealChart2Code, a new large-scale benchmark with over 2,800 instances grounded in authentic datasets and featuring tasks with clear analytical intent. Crucially, it is the first benchmark to systematically evaluate chart generation from large-scale raw data and assess iterative code refinement in a multi-turn conversational setting. Our comprehensive evaluation of 14 leading VLMs on RealChart2Code reveals significant performance degradation compared to simpler benchmarks, highlighting their struggles with complex plot structures and authentic data. Our analysis uncovers a substantial performance gap between proprietary and open-weight models and confirms that even state-of-the-art VLMs often fail to accurately replicate intricate, multi-panel charts. These findings provide valuable insights into the current limitations of VLMs and guide future research directions.

A core barrier preventing recommender systems from reaching their full potential lies in the inherent limitations of user-item interaction data: (1) Sparse user-item interactions, making it difficult to learn reliable user preferences; (2) Traditional contrastive learning methods often treat negative samples as equally hard or easy, ignoring the informative semantic difficulty during training. (3) Modern LLM-based recommender systems, on the other hand, discard all negative feedback, leading to unbalanced preference modeling. To address these issues, we propose LAGCL4Rec, a framework leveraging Large Language Models to Activate interactions in Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation. Our approach operates through three stages: (i) Data-Level: augmenting sparse interactions with balanced positive and negative samples using LLM-enriched profiles; (ii) Rank-Level: assessing semantic difficulty of negative samples through LLM-based grouping for fine-grained contrastive learning; and (iii) Rerank-Level: reasoning over augmented historical interactions for personalized recommendations. Theoretical analysis proves that LAGCL4Rec achieves effective information utilization with minimal computational overhead. Experiments across multiple benchmarks confirm our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.