Deep Research Agents (DRAs) aim to solve complex, long-horizon research tasks involving planning, retrieval, multimodal understanding, and report generation, yet their evaluation remains challenging due to dynamic web environments and ambiguous task definitions. We propose **DR³-Eval**, a realistic and reproducible benchmark for evaluating deep research agents on multimodal, multi-file report generation. DR³-Eval is constructed from authentic user-provided materials and paired with a per-task static research sandbox corpus that simulates open-web complexity while remaining fully verifiable, containing supportive documents, distractors, and noise. Moreover, we introduce a multi-dimensional evaluation framework measuring Information Recall, Factual Accuracy, Citation Coverage, Instruction Following, and Depth Quality, and validate its alignment with human judgments. Experiments with our developed multi-agent system DR³-Agent based on multiple state-of-the-art language models demonstrate that DR³-Eval is highly challenging and reveals critical failure modes in retrieval robustness and hallucination control.

Deep Research Agents have shown strong capability in multi-step information retrieval, reasoning, and long-form report generation, but existing benchmarks and systems remain predominantly text-centric, with limited evaluation of whether visual elements are factually reliable and well aligned with the surrounding analysis. To address this gap, we introduce TVIR (Text–Visual Interleaved Report Generation), which includes TVIR-Bench, a benchmark of 100 expert-curated multimodal deep research tasks that require visual elements to serve specific analytical sub-goals, and TVIR-Agent, a hierarchical multi-agent framework for constructing structured outlines, retrieving images, generating charts with traceable sources, and composing reports through context-aware sequential writing. We further develop a dual-path evaluation framework that combines Textual Assessment and Visual Assessment. Experiments across nine deep research systems show that TVIR-Agent achieves strong overall performance, underscoring the importance of explicit multimodal design and evaluation for evidence-driven report generation.

Intervening the internal activations of large language models (LLMs) provides an effective inference-time alignment approach to mitigate undesirable behaviors, such as generating erroneous or harmful content, thereby ensuring safe and reliable applications of LLMs. However, previous methods neglect the misalignment discrepancy among varied tokens, resulting in deviant alignment direction and inflexible editing strength. To address these issues, we propose a token-aware editing (TAE) approach to fully utilize token-level alignment information in the activation space, therefore realizing superior post-intervention performance. Specifically, a Mutual Information-guided Graph Aggregation (MIG) module first develops an MI-guided graph to exploit the tokens’ informative interaction for activation enrichment, thus improving alignment probing and facilitating intervention. Subsequently, Misalignment-aware Adaptive Intervention (MAI) comprehensively perceives the token-level misalignment degree from token representation and prediction to guide the adaptive adjustment of editing strength, thereby enhancing final alignment performance. Extensive experiments on three alignment capabilities demonstrate the efficacy of TAE, notably surpassing baseline by 25.8% on the primary metric of truthfulness with minimal cost.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has proven effective in enhancing the factuality of LLMs’ generation, making them a focal point of research. However, previous RAG approaches overlook the lexical diversity of queries, hindering their ability to achieve a granular relevance assessment between queries and retrieved documents, resulting in suboptimal performance. In this paper, we introduce a Lexical Diversity-aware RAG (DRAG) method to address the biases in relevant information retrieval and utilization induced by lexical diversity. Specifically, a Diversity-sensitive Relevance Analyzer is proposed to decouple and assess the relevance of different query components (words, phrases) based on their levels of lexical diversity, ensuring precise and comprehensive document retrieval. Moreover, a Risk-guided Sparse Calibration strategy is further introduced to calibrate the generated tokens that is heavily affected by irrelevant content. Through these modules, DRAG is capable of effectively retrieving relevant documents and leverages their pertinent knowledge to refine the original results and generate meaningful outcomes. Extensive experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate the efficacy of our approach, yielding a 10.6% accuracy improvement on HotpotQA.

Training Large Language Models (LLMs) to process extensive context lengths incurs prohibitive computational costs. Prevailing techniques for extending context capabilities in LLMs typically require not only additional training procedures but also access to datasets with long context (e.g., sequences of 32K tokens), presupposing substantial GPU expenditures. To address the aforementioned issues, we introduce a novel solution named Efficient and Extreme length extension for Large Language Models (E2-LLM). E2-LLM entails a singular training process over considerably short sequences (e.g., 4K tokens), which greatly mitigates the cost of continual-pretraining or fine-tuning. Within the training phase, we incorporate a dual augmentation strategy with Rotary Position Embeddings (RoPE) that adjusts the scale and position indices across distinct training samples. E 2 -LLM is meticulously designed to enhance the model’s robustness to diverse relative positions. The experimental results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate the superior performance of E 2 -LLM on demanding tasks of processing long contexts.