Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a central paradigm for improving reasoning and code generation in large language models, and GRPO-style training is widely adopted for its simplicity and effectiveness. However, an important design choice remains underexplored: how token-level policy gradient terms are aggregated within each sampled group. Standard GRPO uses sequence aggregation, while recent work has advocated token aggregation as a better alternative. We show that these two rules induce different optimization biases: token aggregation introduces sign-length coupling, while sequence aggregation implicitly downweights longer responses through sequence-level equal weighting. To address this tension, we propose Balanced Aggregation (BA), a simple drop-in replacement that computes token-level means separately within the positive and negative subsets and then combines them with sequence-count-based weights. Experiments with Qwen2.5-Math-7B and Qwen3-1.7B on DAPO-17k and Polaris, evaluated on six reasoning and coding benchmarks, show that BA consistently improves training stability and final performance over standard token and sequence aggregation. Our analysis further shows that the relative effectiveness of token and sequence aggregation is largely governed by response-length variation and the positive-negative length gap, highlighting aggregation as a critical design dimension in GRPO-style RLVR.

Lifelong learning investigates how models adapt when exposed to a potentially infinite stream of data. Most conventional approaches focus on updating model parameters (i.e., the neural network weights) as the underlying data distribution evolves over time. However, in natural language processing, model parameters are not the only components that matter. The tokenizer, a foundational part of the system, is usually assumed to remain fixed in lifelong learning scenarios. In this work, we challenge the validity of this assumption: as language evolves, a static tokenizer fragments newly emerging lexical items, reducing compression efficiency and consequently degrading the model performance. We introduce the Temporal Drift Tokenizer (Ted-Tok), which maintains an evolving vocabulary that adapts to emerging linguistic patterns over time. This adaptivity is driven by time-weighted frequency estimators that smooth short-term fluctuations to capture persistent linguistic trends, and a principled addition-deletion strategy targeting sink tokens. Across multiple domains, Ted-Tok consistently improves compression and task performance, with gains increasing under stronger drift, underscoring the role of tokenizer adaptivity in lifelong learning.