Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on complex tasks through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. However, conventional CoT relies on explicitly verbalized intermediate steps, which constrains its broader applicability, particularly in abstract reasoning tasks beyond language. To address this, there has been growing research interest in latent CoT reasoning, where the reasoning process is embedded entirely within latent spaces. By decoupling reasoning from explicit language generation, latent CoT offers the promise of richer cognitive representations and facilitates more flexible, faster inference. This paper aims to present a comprehensive overview of this emerging paradigm and establish a systematic taxonomy. We analyze recent advances in methods, categorizing them from token-wise horizontal approaches to layer-wise vertical strategies. We then provide in-depth discussions of these methods, highlighting their design principles, applications, and remaining challenges. We hope that our survey provides a structured foundation for advancing this promising direction in LLM reasoning.

Current context augmentation methods, such as retrieval-augmented generation, play a crucial role in bridging a model’s internal knowledge boundary and external evidence for multi-hop reasoning. However, they often follow a rigid policy and treat external retrieval as the default action at each step. Such brute-force context expansion incurs unnecessary computational cost and may degrade reasoning performance by saturating the context with redundant or weakly relevant evidence. In this paper, we propose Cross-Boundary Context Evolution (EvoCtx), a framework that models complex reasoning as an adaptive process of boundary-aware context evolution. EvoCtx dynamically decides whether the next reasoning transition should cross the current evidence boundary through retrieval or refine the reasoning state within the existing context. It estimates the semantic gap between the reasoning state and the accumulated evidence, and strategically alternates between boundary expansion and intra-boundary trajectory refinement. This eliminates redundant retrieval steps and preserves a compact, evidence-supported reasoning trajectory. Extensive experiments on challenging open-domain and multi-hop QA benchmarks demonstrate that EvoCtx significantly outperforms previous methods, offering an effective approach to complex tasks. The source code can be accessed at https://github.com/Anya-RB-Chen/EvoCtx.

Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success through step-by-step chains of thought, yet they often suffer from excessive redundancy or unfaithful reasoning. Existing methods for shaping LRM behavior typically rely on reinforcement learning or fine-tuning with gold-standard reasoning traces, a paradigm that is both computationally expensive and difficult to scale. In this paper, we reveal that LRMs possess latent reasoning beliefs that internally track their own reasoning traits, which can be captured through simple logit probing without specialized training. Building on this insight, we propose Reasoning Belief Engineering (RELIEF), a simple yet effective framework that shapes LRM behavior by aligning the model’s self-concept with a target belief blueprint. Crucially, RELIEF completely bypasses the need for reasoning-trace supervision. It internalizes desired traits by fine-tuning on synthesized, self-reflective QA pairs that affirm the target belief. Extensive experiments on efficiency and faithfulness tasks demonstrate that RELIEF matches or outperforms behavior-supervised and preference-based baselines while requiring significantly lower training costs. Our analysis further validates that shifting a model’s reasoning belief effectively shapes its actual behavior.

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have enabled agents to tackle complex embodied tasks through environmental interaction. However, these agents still make suboptimal decisions and perform ineffective actions, as they often overlook critical environmental feedback that differs from their internal beliefs. Through a formal probing analysis, we characterize this as belief inertia, a phenomenon where agents stubbornly adhere to prior beliefs despite explicit observations. To address this, we advocate active belief intervention, moving from passive understanding to active management. We introduce the Estimate-Verify-Update (EVU) mechanism, which empowers agents to predict expected outcomes, verify them against observations through explicit reasoning, and actively update prior beliefs based on the verification evidence. EVU is designed as a unified intervention mechanism that generates textual belief states explicitly, and can be integrated into both prompting-based and training-based agent reasoning methods. Extensive experiments across three embodied benchmarks demonstrate that EVU consistently yields substantial gains in task success rates. Further analyses validate that our approach effectively mitigates belief inertia, advancing the development of more robust embodied agents. Our code is available at https://github.com/WangHanLinHenry/EVU.

Real-world recommendation scenarios are commonly grounded in shared physical environments during user–recommender interactions. This motivates situated conversational recommendation (SCR), a complex task requiring recommender assistants to jointly reason over dialogue history, co-observed scenes, and in-scene item attributes. However, current approaches struggle with this setting due to two intertwined challenges: accurately understanding situated user preferences throughout the conversation and generating responses that simultaneously satisfy user needs and grounded situations. To this end, we propose Re2A, a framework that formulates SCR as a structured reason-then-align process. We introduce rubric-based preference reasoning, which uses automated rubrics to guide the model toward producing explicit preference states. Based on these states, we propose a preference-conditioned optimization to align response generation with dual objectives: user preference satisfaction and situation consistency. Extensive experiments on two SCR datasets demonstrate that Re2A consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, delivering more precise, context-aware conversational recommendations. Our code is available at https://github.com/DongdingLin/Re2A.

Automatic Survey Generation (ASG) aims to produce comprehensive literature surveys by retrieving, organizing, and synthesizing academic papers. Despite rapid progress in specialized ASG frameworks and Deep Research agents, existing evaluations largely center on Computer Science or rely on generic criteria, leaving it unclear whether current systems satisfy the survey standards of diverse disciplines. We introduce SurveyLens, the first discipline-aware ASG benchmark. SurveyLens comprises SurveyLens-1k, a curated dataset of 1,000 human-written surveys across 10 disciplines, and a dual-lens framework that combines discipline-aware rubric scoring with reference-based alignment to human-written surveys. Evaluating 11 state-of-the-art systems spanning vanilla LLMs, specialized ASG systems, and Deep Research agents, we find that Deep Research agents perform most consistently across the 10 disciplines, some specialized ASG systems show particular strength in outline generation, and reference coverage and relevance remain a shared bottleneck across paradigms. These findings further provide practical guidance for discipline-specific system selection and future ASG design.

World models enable language agents to anticipate environment dynamics and evaluate candidate actions before execution, yet they are typically frozen after training, leaving them unable to adapt to the shifting on-policy distributions induced by evolving agents. Meanwhile, agent-improvement methods often depend on external rewards or verifiers that may be unavailable in realistic interactive environments. We introduce CoMap, a framework that co-evolves textual world models and agent policies through closed-loop interaction. At each decision step, the world model predicts future environment feedback for candidate actions, while the agent performs future-aware reflection by assessing the reliability of these predictions and refining its action accordingly. The resulting on-policy trajectories are then used to improve the world model through self-distillation, enabling it to continually adapt to the agent’s evolving interaction distribution. Across embodied task planning, web navigation, and tool-use benchmarks, CoMap consistently outperforms competitive baselines (e.g., a 16.75% relative improvement with Qwen3-4B). Further analyses show that this co-evolutionary process improves both world-model capability and long-horizon decision-making. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/loyiv/CoMAP.

Recent advances in world models have shown promise for modeling future dynamics of environmental states, enabling agents to reason and act without accessing real environments. Current methods mainly perform single-step or fixed-horizon rollouts, leaving their potential for complex task planning under-exploited. We propose Imagine-then-Plan (ITP), a unified framework for agent learning via lookahead imagination, where an agent’s policy model interacts with the learned world model, yielding multi-step “imagined” trajectories. Since the imagination horizon may vary by tasks and stages, we introduce a novel adaptive lookahead mechanism by trading off the ultimate goal and task progress. The resulting imagined trajectories provide rich signals about future consequences, such as achieved progress and potential conflicts, which are fused with current observations, formulating a partially observable and imaginable Markov decision process to guide policy learning. We instantiate ITP with both training-free and reinforcement-trained variants. Extensive experiments across representative agent benchmarks demonstrate that ITP significantly outperforms competitive baselines. Further analyses validate that our adaptive lookahead largely enhances agents’ reasoning capability, providing valuable insights into addressing broader, complex tasks. Our code and data are publicly available at:https://github.com/loyiv/ITP.

Situated conversational recommendation (SCR), which utilizes visual scenes grounded in specific environments and natural language dialogue to deliver contextually appropriate recommendations, has emerged as a promising research direction due to its close alignment with real-world scenarios. Compared to traditional recommendations, SCR requires a deeper understanding of dynamic and implicit user preferences, as the surrounding scene often influences users’ underlying interests, while both may evolve across conversations. This complexity significantly impacts the timing and relevance of recommendations. To address this, we propose situated preference reasoning (SiPeR), a novel framework that integrates two core mechanisms: (1) Scene transition estimation, which estimates whether the current scene satisfies user needs, and guides the user toward a more suitable scene when necessary; and (2) Bayesian inverse inference, which leverages the likelihood of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to predict user preferences about candidate items within the scene. Extensive experiments on two representative benchmarks demonstrate SiPeR’s superiority in both recommendation accuracy and response generation quality. The code and data are available at https://github.com/DongdingLin/SiPeR.

Reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) have generally advanced significantly. However, it is still challenging for existing reasoning-based LLMs to perform effective decision-making abilities in multi-agent environments, due to the absence of explicit foresight modeling. To this end, strategic reasoning, the most fundamental capability to anticipate the counterpart’s behaviors and foresee its possible future actions, has been introduced to alleviate the above issues. Strategic reasoning is fundamental to effective decision-making in multi-agent environments, yet existing reasoning enhancement methods for LLMs do not explicitly capture its foresight nature. In this work, we introduce Foresight Policy Optimization (FoPO) to enhance strategic reasoning in LLMs, which integrates opponent modeling principles into policy optimization, thereby enabling explicit consideration of both self-interest and counterpart influence. Specifically, we construct two curated datasets, namely Cooperative RSA and Competitive Taboo, equipped with well-designed rules and moderate difficulty to facilitate a systematic investigation of FoPO in a self-play framework. Our experiments demonstrate that FoPO significantly enhances strategic reasoning across LLMs of varying sizes and origins. Moreover, models trained with FoPO exhibit strong generalization to out-of-domain strategic scenarios, substantially outperforming standard LLM reasoning optimization baselines.

The increasing demand for domain-specific evaluation of large language models (LLMs) has led to the development of numerous benchmarks. These efforts often adhere to the principle of data scaling, relying on large corpora or extensive question-answer (QA) sets to ensure broad coverage. However, the impact of corpus and QA set design on the precision and recall of domain-specific LLM performance remains poorly understood. In this paper, we argue that data scaling is not always the optimal principle for domain-specific benchmark construction. Instead, we introduce Comp-Comp, an iterative benchmarking framework grounded in the principle of comprehensiveness and compactness. Comprehensiveness ensures semantic recall by covering the full breadth of the domain, while compactness improves precision by reducing redundancy and noise. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, we present a case study conducted at a well-renowned university, resulting in the creation of PolyBench, a large-scale, high-quality academic benchmark. Although this study focuses on academia, the Comp-Comp framework is domain-agnostic and readily adaptable to a wide range of specialized fields. The source code and datasets can be accessed at https://github.com/Anya-RB-Chen/COMP-COMP.

Intelligent tutoring agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly explored to deliver personalized knowledge in areas such as language learning and science education. However, their capabilities in guiding users to solve complex real-world tasks remain underexplored. To address this limitation, in this work, we focus on coding tutoring, a challenging problem that requires tutors to proactively guide students towards completing predefined coding tasks. We propose a novel agent workflow, Trace-and-Verify (TRAVER), which combines knowledge tracing to estimate a student’s knowledge state and turn-by-turn verification to ensure effective guidance toward task completion. We introduce DICT, an automatic evaluation protocol that assesses tutor agents using controlled student simulation and code generation tests. Extensive experiments reveal the challenges of coding tutoring and demonstrate that TRAVER achieves a significantly higher success rate. Although we use code tutoring as an example in this paper, our approach can be extended beyond coding, providing valuable insights into advancing tutoring agents for human task learning.

Large language model (LLM)-based agents have shown promise in tackling complex tasks by interacting dynamically with the environment. Existing work primarily focuses on behavior cloning from expert demonstrations or preference learning through exploratory trajectory sampling. However, these methods often struggle to address long-horizon tasks, where suboptimal actions accumulate step by step, causing agents to deviate from correct task trajectories.To address this, we highlight the importance of timely calibration and the need to automatically construct calibration trajectories for training agents. We propose Step-Level Trajectory Calibration (STeCa), a novel framework for LLM agent learning. Specifically, STeCa identifies suboptimal actions through a step-level reward comparison during exploration. It constructs calibrated trajectories using LLM-driven reflection, enabling agents to learn from improved decision-making processes. We finally leverage these calibrated trajectories with successful trajectories for reinforced training.Extensive experiments demonstrate that STeCa significantly outperforms existing methods. Further analysis highlights that timely calibration enables agents to complete tasks with greater robustness. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/WangHanLinHenry/STeCa.

The safety alignment of large language models (LLMs) remains vulnerable, as their initial behavior can be easily jailbroken by even relatively simple attacks. Since infilling a fixed template between the input instruction and initial model output is a common practice for existing LLMs, we hypothesize that this template is a key factor behind their vulnerabilities: LLMs’ safety-related decision-making overly relies on the aggregated information from the template region, which largely influences these models’ safety behavior. We refer to this issue as template-anchored safety alignment. In this paper, we conduct extensive experiments and verify that template-anchored safety alignment is widespread across various aligned LLMs. Our mechanistic analyses demonstrate how it leads to models’ susceptibility when encountering inference-time jailbreak attacks. Furthermore, we show that detaching safety mechanisms from the template region is promising in mitigating vulnerabilities to jailbreak attacks. We encourage future research to develop more robust safety alignment techniques that reduce reliance on the template region.

Language models are exhibiting increasing capability in knowledge utilization and reasoning. However, when applied as agents in embodied environments, they often suffer from misalignment between their intrinsic knowledge and environmental knowledge, leading to infeasible actions. Traditional environment alignment methods, such as supervised learning on expert trajectories and reinforcement learning, encounter limitations in covering environmental knowledge and achieving efficient convergence, respectively. Inspired by human learning, we propose Exploration-based Error Correction Learning (E²CL), a novel framework that leverages exploration-induced errors and environmental feedback to enhance environment alignment for embodied agents. E²CL incorporates teacher-guided and teacher-free explorations to gather environmental feedback and correct erroneous actions. The agent learns to provide feedback and self-correct, thereby enhancing its adaptability to target environments. Extensive experiments in the VirtualHome environment demonstrate that E²CL-trained agents outperform those trained by baseline methods and exhibit superior self-correction capabilities.

Tuning language models for dialogue generation has been a prevalent paradigm for building capable dialogue agents. Yet, traditional tuning narrowly views dialogue generation as resembling other language generation tasks, ignoring the role disparities between two speakers and the multi-round interactive process that dialogues ought to be. Such a manner often leads to unsatisfactory chat consistency for the built agent. In this work, we emphasize the interactive, communicative nature of dialogue and argue that it is more feasible to model the speaker roles of agent and user separately, enabling the agent to adhere to its role consistently. With this in mind, we propose an efficient Multi-round Interactive Dialogue Tuning (Midi-Tuning) framework. It models the agent and user individually with two adapters built upon large language models. The adapters make use of respective utterances round by round in alternating order and they are tuned via a round-level memory caching mechanism. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, our framework performs superior to traditional fine-tuning and harbors the tremendous potential for improving dialogue consistency.

Medical dialogue systems (MDS) aim to provide patients with medical services, such as diagnosis and prescription. Since most patients cannot precisely describe their symptoms, dialogue understanding is challenging for MDS. Previous studies mainly addressed this by extracting the mentioned medical entities as critical dialogue history information. In this work, we argue that it is also essential to capture the transitions of the medical entities and the doctor’s dialogue acts in each turn, as they help the understanding of how the dialogue flows and enhance the prediction of the entities and dialogue acts to be adopted in the following turn. Correspondingly, we propose a Dual Flow enhanced Medical (DFMed) dialogue generation framework. It extracts the medical entities and dialogue acts used in the dialogue history and models their transitions with an entity-centric graph flow and a sequential act flow, respectively. We employ two sequential models to encode them and devise an interweaving component to enhance their interactions. Experiments on two datasets demonstrate that our method exceeds baselines in both automatic and manual evaluations.

Goal-directed dialogue systems aim to proactively reach a pre-determined target through multi-turn conversations. The key to achieving this task lies in planning dialogue paths that smoothly and coherently direct conversations towards the target. However, this is a challenging and under-explored task. In this work, we propose a coherent dialogue planning approach that uses a stochastic process to model the temporal dynamics of dialogue paths. We define a latent space that captures the coherence of goal-directed behavior using a Brownian bridge process, which allows us to incorporate user feedback flexibly in dialogue planning. Based on the derived latent trajectories, we generate dialogue paths explicitly using pre-trained language models. We finally employ these paths as natural language prompts to guide dialogue generation. Our experiments show that our approach generates more coherent utterances and achieves the goal with a higher success rate.

Target-oriented dialogue systems, designed to proactively steer conversations toward predefined targets or accomplish specific system-side goals, are an exciting area in conversational AI. In this work, by formulating a <dialogue act, topic> pair as the conversation target, we explore a novel problem of personalized target-oriented dialogue by considering personalization during the target accomplishment process. However, there remains an emergent need for high-quality datasets, and building one from scratch requires tremendous human effort. To address this, we propose an automatic dataset curation framework using a role-playing approach. Based on this framework, we construct a large-scale personalized target-oriented dialogue dataset, TopDial, which comprises about 18K multi-turn dialogues. The experimental results show that this dataset is of high quality and could contribute to exploring personalized target-oriented dialogue.

Language model detoxification aims to minimize the risk of generating offensive or harmful content in pretrained language models (PLMs) for safer deployment. Existing methods can be roughly categorized as finetuning-based and decoding-based. However, the former is often resource-intensive, while the latter relies on additional components and potentially compromises the generation fluency. In this paper, we propose a more lightweight approach that enables the PLM itself to achieve “self-detoxification”. Our method is built upon the observation that prepending a negative steering prompt can effectively induce PLMs to generate toxic content. At the same time, we are inspired by the recent research in the interpretability field, which formulates the evolving contextualized representations within the PLM as an information stream facilitated by the attention layers. Drawing on this idea, we devise a method to identify the toxification direction from the normal generation process to the one prompted with the negative prefix, and then steer the generation to the reversed direction by manipulating the information movement within the attention layers. Experimental results show that our approach, without any fine-tuning or extra components, can achieve comparable performance with state-of-the-art methods.

Existing end-to-end task-oriented dialog systems struggle to dynamically model long dialog context for interactions and effectively incorporate knowledge base (KB) information into dialog generation. To conquer these limitations, we propose a Dual Dynamic Memory Network (DDMN) for multi-turn dialog generation, which maintains two core components: dialog memory manager and KB memory manager. The dialog memory manager dynamically expands the dialog memory turn by turn and keeps track of dialog history with an updating mechanism, which encourages the model to filter irrelevant dialog history and memorize important newly coming information. The KB memory manager shares the structural KB triples throughout the whole conversation, and dynamically extracts KB information with a memory pointer at each turn. Experimental results on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that DDMN significantly outperforms the strong baselines in terms of both automatic evaluation and human evaluation. Our code is available at https://github.com/siat-nlp/DDMN.