Visually linking matching cues is a crucial ability in daily life, such as identifying the same person in multiple photos based on their cues, even without knowing who they are. Despite the extensive knowledge that vision-language models (VLMs) possess, it remains largely unexplored whether they are capable of performing this fundamental task. To address this, we introduce VLM2-Bench, a benchmark designed to assess whether VLMs can Visually Link Matching cues, with 9 subtasks and over 3,000 test cases. Comprehensive evaluation across twelve VLMs, along with further analysis of various language-side and vision-side prompting methods, leads to a total of eight key findings. We identify critical challenges in models’ ability to link visual cues, highlighting a significant performance gap. Based on these insights, we advocate for (i) enhancing core visual capabilities to improve adaptability and reduce reliance on prior knowledge, (ii) establishing clearer principles for integrating language-based reasoning in vision-centric tasks to prevent unnecessary biases, and (iii) shifting vision-text training paradigms toward fostering models’ ability to independently structure and infer relationships among visual cues.

Most LLMs universally excel at generating code for high-resource programming languages (HRPLs) like Python, a capability that has become standard due to the abundance of training data. However, they struggle significantly with low-resource programming languages (LRPLs) such as D, exacerbating the digital divide. This gap limits developers using LRPLs from equally benefiting and hinders innovation within underrepresented programming communities. To make matters worse, manually generating data for LRPLs is highly labor intensive and requires expensive expert effort. In this work, we begin by analyzing the NL-PL Gap, where LLMs’ direct-generated LRPL data often suffers from subpar quality due to the misalignment between natural language (NL) instructions and programming language (PL) outputs. To address this issue, we introduce Bridge-Assist Generation, a method to generate LRPL data utilizing LLM’s general knowledge, HRPL proficiency, and in-context learning capabilities. To further maximize the utility of the generated data, we propose Bridged Alignment to obtain Bridge-Coder. To thoroughly evaluate our approach, we select four relatively LRPLs: R, D, Racket, and Bash. Experimental results reveal that Bridge-Coder achieves significant improvements over the original model, with average gains of 18.71 and 10.81 on two comprehensive benchmarks, M-HumanEval and M-MBPP.

Web agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for next-generation AI, but their limited reasoning in uncertain, dynamic web environments hinders robust deployment. In this paper, we identify key reasoning skills essential for effective web agents, i.e., reflection & lookahead, branching, and rollback, and curate trajectory data that exemplifies these abilities by reconstructing the agent’s (inference-time) reasoning algorithms into chain-of-thought rationales. We conduct experiments in the agent self-improving benchmark, OpenWebVoyager, and demonstrate that distilling salient reasoning patterns into the backbone LLM via simple fine-tuning can substantially enhance its performance. Our approach yields significant improvements across multiple benchmarks, including WebVoyager, Mind2web-live, and SimpleQA (web search), highlighting the potential of targeted reasoning skill enhancement for web agents.