With the global proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs), cultural safety, defined as the ability to generate respectful and appropriate responses across diverse cultures, becomes critical for responsible AI deployment. However, existing research often treats cultural safety and cultural knowledge in isolation. It remains unclear whether cultural safety is grounded in understanding varying cultural knowledge to enable LLMs to adaptively yield respectful and appropriate responses across diverse cultures, which triggers ethical concerns in cross-cultural scenarios.

In this work, we introduce AdaCultureSafe, a dataset designed to jointly evaluate cultural safety and knowledge. Through AdaCultureSafe, we reveal a critical insight: a significant decoupling exists between cultural safety and cultural knowledge proficiency. Although LLMs possess rich cultural knowledge, they fail to leverage it to improve cultural safety. LLMs tend to rely on generic safety rather than safety based on culture-specific knowledge. Motivated by this, we propose a knowledge-grounded method that elicits internal cultural knowledge in LLMs during response generation. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach effectively improves cultural safety. Our work can aid better understanding the landscape of cultural safety of LLMs.

SQL code completion boosts developer productivity by predicting missing snippets from editing SQL contexts. However, existing solutions yield low acceptance since they cannot abstain when no suggestion is needed and lack SQL-specific training. To address both limitations, we introduce PACE-SQL, a preference-aligned framework that improves SQL completion accuracy and user preference alignment. We build two datasets with completion and abstention samples: WeSQL-1.5M from real-world interaction logs to capture authentic user preferences, and OpenSQL-FIM from public SQL corpora. We adopt continual pretraining and supervised fine-tuning to improve completion quality, and design a reward function in the reinforcement learning to enhance alignment with user preferences. Experiments show PACE-SQL improves Exact Match and Edit Similarity scores by 9.67% and 7.52% over the best baseline on WeSQL-1.5M and raises online user acceptance rate from 5% to 29%.

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success on complex tasks by generating detailed Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. However, they tend to apply a uniform, computation-intensive deep reasoning strategy to all problems, leading to unnecessary overhead on simple tasks. This significantly hinders their efficiency in real-world applications. While existing methods have improved reasoning efficiency to some extent, they still face critical challenges such as conflicting objectives, limited adaptability. To address these limitations, we propose AdaMix, an adaptive reasoning framework via decoupled optimization. To mitigate optimization conflicts, AdaMix first constructs two specialized adapters: an efficiency-oriented short adapter and an accuracy-oriented long adapter. It then incorporates a difficulty-aware routing model that assesses problem complexity to predict a reasoning intensity coefficient. This coefficient is used to dynamically interpolate a mixed adapter from the two base adapters, enabling fine-grained reasoning control. Our experiment demonstrates that our AdaMix reduces the average response length of DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B by 54.9% while improving accuracy by up to 4.8% on five mathematical datasets, thus indicating a favorable accuracy-efficiency trade-off.

The Human Value Detection shared task\cite{kiesel:2023} aims to classify whether or not the argument draws on a set of 20 value categories, given a textual argument. This is a difficult task as the discrimination of human values behind arguments is often implicit. Moreover, the number of label categories can be up to 20 and the distribution of data is highly imbalanced. To address these issues, we employ a multi-label classification model and utilize a class-balanced loss function. Our system wins 5 first places, 2 second places, and 6 third places out of 20 categories of the Human Value Detection shared task, and our overall average score of 0.54 also places third. The code is publicly available at \url{https://www.github.com/diqiuzhuanzhuan/semeval2023}.