Jie Zhang
Other people with similar names: Jie Zhang, Jie Zhang, Jie Zhang, Jie Zhang
Unverified author pages with similar names: Jie Zhang
2026
Thinking Economically: A Hierarchical Framework for Adaptive-Complexity Reasoning in LLMs
Yubo Gao | Haotian Wu | Hong Chen | Junquan Huang | Yibo Yan | Jungang Li | Zihao Dongfang | Sicheng Tao | PS Tan | Jie Zhang | Xuming Hu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Yubo Gao | Haotian Wu | Hong Chen | Junquan Huang | Yibo Yan | Jungang Li | Zihao Dongfang | Sicheng Tao | PS Tan | Jie Zhang | Xuming Hu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has significantly enhanced LLM reasoning, yet often incurs substantial computational overhead due to “overthinking”: generating excessively long rationales without commensurate accuracy gains. Existing efficiency methods typically apply uniform compression, which overlooks a critical observation that reasoning complexity is heterogeneous at two distinct granularities: across different problems and within individual reasoning steps. This motivates our principle of Thinking Economically: intelligently allocating computational resources based on intrinsic task and step demands rather than pursuing uniform brevity. We propose Hierarchical Adaptive Budgeter (HAB), a training framework that operationalizes this principle through coarse-to-fine budgeting. At the inter-step level, HAB predicts the optimal reasoning depth for each problem. At the intra-step level, HAB learns step-specific token budgeting signals from PPL-derived step comparisons and an adaptive Pareto optimization objective that captures the local quality-efficiency trade-off, while a Fisher Information-based pruner further provides fine-grained training-time guidance, thereby encouraging the generator to internalize more economical reasoning patterns. Experiments on GSM8K and MATH500 show that HAB not only surpasses standard CoT in accuracy but also reduces token usage, achieving a stronger performance-efficiency trade-off than the compared baselines.
Adaptive and Representative Multi-Interest Modeling for Recommendation with Large Language Model
Ziyan Wang | Yingpeng Du | Tianjun Wei | Haoyan Chua | Jieyi Bi | Jie Zhang | Zhu Sun
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Ziyan Wang | Yingpeng Du | Tianjun Wei | Haoyan Chua | Jieyi Bi | Jie Zhang | Zhu Sun
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Large language models (LLMs) show potential for multi-interest analysis of users in recommender systems, going beyond heuristic assumptions in existing methods, e.g., co-occurring items indicate the same interest. Despite the effectiveness, two key challenges remain. First, the granularity of raw generation of LLMs for multi-interests is agnostic, possibly leading to overly fine or coarse interest grouping. Second, adopting LLM to analyze individual user behaviors lacks a global perspective on how items relate across users. In this paper, we propose an LLM-driven adaptive and representative multi-interest modeling framework to address these challenges. At the user-individual level, we exploit LLM analysis and alleviate the agnostic granularity by adaptively aggregating semantic clusters to collaborative multi-interests. At the user-crowd level, to mitigate the limited insights in individual behaviors, we formulate a max covering problem to expand the scope of LLM analysis with compactness and representativeness, disentangling interest representations from global perspectives. Experiments on real-world datasets show that our approach outperforms various baselines.
Mirroring Users: Towards Building Preference-aligned User Simulator with User Feedback in Recommendation
Tianjun Wei | Huizhong Guo | Yingpeng Du | Zhu Sun | Huang Chen | Dongxia Wang | Jie Zhang
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Tianjun Wei | Huizhong Guo | Yingpeng Du | Zhu Sun | Huang Chen | Dongxia Wang | Jie Zhang
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
User simulation is increasingly vital to develop and evaluate recommender systems (RSs). While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising avenues to simulate user behavior, they often struggle with the absence of specific task alignment required for RSs and the efficiency demands of large-scale simulation. A vast yet underutilized resource for enhancing this alignment is the extensive user feedback inherent in RSs, but leveraging it is challenging due to its ambiguity, noise and massive volume, which hinders efficient preference alignment. To overcome these hurdles, we introduce a novel data construction framework that leverages user feedback in RSs with advanced LLM capabilities to generate high-quality simulation data. Our framework unfolds in two key phases: (1) using LLMs to generate decision-making processes as explanatory rationales on simulation samples, thereby reducing ambiguity; and (2) data distillation based on uncertainty estimation and behavior sampling to efficiently filter the most informative, denoised samples. Accordingly, we fine-tune lightweight LLMs, as user simulators, using such high-quality dataset with corresponding decision-making processes. Extensive experiments confirm that our framework significantly boosts the alignment with human preferences and the in-domain reasoning capabilities of the fine-tuned LLMs, providing more insightful and interpretable signals for RS interaction. We believe our work, together with publicly available developed framework, high-quality mixed-domain dataset, and fine-tuned LLM checkpoints, will advance the RS community and offer valuable insights for broader human-centric AI research. Our code is available at https://github.com/Joinn99/UserMirrorer.