Peer review serves as a backbone of academic research, but in most AI conferences, the review quality is degrading as the number of submissions explodes. To reliably detect low-quality reviews, we define misinformed review points as either "weaknesses" in a review that contain incorrect premises, or "questions" in a review that can be already answered by the paper. We verify that 15.2% of weaknesses and 26.4% of questions are misinformed and introduce ReviewScore indicating if a review point is misinformed. To evaluate the factuality of each premise of weaknesses, we propose an automated engine that reconstructs every explicit and implicit premise from a weakness. We build a human expert-annotated ReviewScore dataset to check the ability of LLMs to automate ReviewScore evaluation. Then, we measure human-model agreements on ReviewScore using eight current state-of-the-art LLMs. The models show F1 scores of 0.4–0.5 and kappa scores of 0.3–0.4, indicating moderate agreement but also suggesting that fully automating the evaluation remains challenging. A thorough disagreement analysis reveals that most errors are due to models’ incorrect reasoning. We also prove that evaluating premise-level factuality shows significantly higher agreements than evaluating weakness-level factuality.

The growing demand for scalable mental health support has increased interest in AI-based counseling systems grounded in Motivational Interviewing (MI). However, existing MI datasets do not explicitly model the structured progression of MI phases, which is essential for effective and goal-oriented counseling. To address this gap, we introduce PhaseMI, a phase-structured MI dataset, together with a data generation framework that employs therapist, client, and supervisor LLMs to explicitly control phase transitions. Compared to the best alternative baseline, PhaseMI achieves improved coverage of MI phases, with gains of 12.3% in exploring, 37.6% in guiding, and 61.1% in choosing, and experimental evaluations demonstrate that it yields higher overall counseling quality than baseline datasets.

Named geographic entities (geo-entities for short) are the building blocks of many geographic datasets. Characterizing geo-entities is integral to various application domains, such as geo-intelligence and map comprehension, while a key challenge is to capture the spatial-varying context of an entity. We hypothesize that we shall know the characteristics of a geo-entity by its surrounding entities, similar to knowing word meanings by their linguistic context. Accordingly, we propose a novel spatial language model, SpaBERT, which provides a general-purpose geo-entity representation based on neighboring entities in geospatial data. SpaBERT extends BERT to capture linearized spatial context, while incorporating a spatial coordinate embedding mechanism to preserve spatial relations of entities in the 2-dimensional space. SpaBERT is pretrained with masked language modeling and masked entity prediction tasks to learn spatial dependencies. We apply SpaBERT to two downstream tasks: geo-entity typing and geo-entity linking. Compared with the existing language models that do not use spatial context, SpaBERT shows significant performance improvement on both tasks. We also analyze the entity representation from SpaBERT in various settings and the effect of spatial coordinate embedding.