We evaluate GPT-4o’s color naming across nine languages using both synthetic and human-derived stimuli. Using hue wheels, fixed basic categories, low-chroma hue lines, and dense binned CIELAB grids, we separate lexical availability of color terms from distributional agreement with human color naming. GPT-4o reliably names vivid, high-chroma colors and reproduces several known language-specific distinctions under constrained settings. However, its performance degrades sharply for low-chroma colors and for stimuli near human category boundaries. In these regions, model-human divergence remains high. Overall, GPT-4o shows strong cross-linguistic lexical knowledge but does not reliably match human color-naming distributions, especially in low-chroma and boundary regions.

Euphemisms substitute socially sensitive expressions, often softening or reframing meaning, and their reliance on cultural and pragmatic context complicates modeling across languages. In this study, we investigate how cross-lingual equivalence influences transfer in multilingual euphemism detection. We categorize Potentially Euphemistic Terms (PETs) in Turkish and English into Overlapping (OPETs) and Non-Overlapping (NOPETs) subsets based on their functional, pragmatic, and semantic alignment. Our findings reveal a transfer asymmetry: semantic overlap is insufficient to guarantee positive transfer, particularly in low-resource Turkish-to-English direction, where performance can degrade even for overlapping euphemisms, and in some cases, improve under NOPET-based training. Differences in label distribution help explain these counterintuitive results. Category-level analysis suggests that transfer may be influenced by domain-specific alignment, though evidence is limited by sparsity.