When a student fails an exam, do we tend to blame their effort or the test’s difficulty? Attribution, defined as how reasons are assigned to event outcomes, shapes perceptions, reinforces stereotypes, and influences decisions. Attribution Theory explains how people attribute causes to internal factors (effort, ability) or external ones (task difficulty, luck). LLMs’ attribution of event outcomes based on demographics carries important fairness implications. Most works exploring social biases in LLMs focus on surface-level associations or isolated stereotypes. This work proposes a cognitively grounded bias evaluation framework to identify how models’ reasoning disparities shape demographic bias across three contexts: single-actor, actor–actor, and actor–observer, capturing comparative and perspective-driven biases overlooked in prior work. Introducing a 140k-prompt benchmark covering ten scenarios and four social dimensions, our analyses reveal attribution asymmetries across identities that vary in multi-actor and observer settings, suggesting that other identities influence bias. This work underscores the need for cognitively grounded bias evaluation and informs future debiasing efforts through the proposed framework.

Self-evolving large language models (LLMs) learn by generating their own training tasks and solutions, reducing reliance on human-curated supervision. However, in many reasoning domains, the model must also validate generated tasks and judge generated answers to obtain training signals. This creates a training-signal challenge: erroneous self-judgments become erroneous gradient updates. Existing approaches either rely on external verifiers, which limits generality, or treat noisy self-generated feedback as supervision. We propose COSE (Confidence-Orchestrated Self-Evolution), which uses the LLM’s intrinsic confidence as a lightweight uncertainty signal to modulate learning. COSE introduces confidence-weighted PPO updates and confidence-prioritized replay. Across 19 held-out benchmarks and four Qwen/Llama backbones (0.6B–4B), COSE consistently improves over base models and achieves the best average performance in general reasoning and mathematics, while remaining competitive on code. Code and data are available at https://github.com/weibowen555/COSE_.

Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit social biases inherited from their training data. While existing benchmarks evaluate bias by term-based mode through direct term associations between demographic terms and bias terms, LLMs have become increasingly adept at avoiding biased responses, leading to seemingly low levels of bias. However, biases persist in subtler, contextually hidden forms that traditional benchmarks fail to capture. We introduce the Description-based Bias Benchmark (DBB), a novel dataset designed to assess bias at the semantic level that bias concepts are hidden within naturalistic, subtly framed contexts in real-world scenarios rather than superficial terms. We analyze six state-of-the-art LLMs, revealing that while models reduce bias in response at the term level, they continue to reinforce biases in nuanced settings. Data, code, and results are available at https://github.com/JP-25/Description-based-Bias-Benchmark.