The multilingual capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have attracted considerable attention over the past decade. Assessing the accuracy with which LLMs provide answers in multilingual contexts is essential for determining their level of multilingual proficiency. Nevertheless, existing multilingual benchmarks generally reveal severe drawbacks, such as overly translated content (translationese), the absence of difficulty control, constrained diversity, and disciplinary imbalance, making the benchmarking process unreliable and showing low convincingness. To alleviate those shortcomings, we introduce NOVA-63 (Native Omni-lingual Versatile Assessments of 63 Disciplines), a comprehensive, difficult multilingual benchmark featuring 93,536 questions sourced from native speakers across 14 languages and 63 academic disciplines. Leveraging a robust pipeline that integrates LLM-assisted formatting, expert quality verification, and multi-level difficulty screening, NOVA-63 is balanced on disciplines with consistent difficulty standards while maintaining authentic linguistic elements. Extensive experimentation with current LLMs has shown significant insights into cross-lingual consistency among language families, and exposed notable disparities in models’ capabilities across various disciplines. This work provides valuable benchmarking data for the future development of multilingual models. Furthermore, our findings underscore the importance of moving beyond overall scores and instead conducting fine-grained analyses of model performance.

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in general language tasks, motivating their adaptation to specialized domains such as healthcare. Effective domain adaptation typically involves supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on carefully selected instruction-tuning data. Current data selection methods adopt a data-centric approach, relying on external annotations and heuristics to identify externally defined high-quality or challenging data. Our exploratory experiments highlight this approach fails to improve the model’s domain performance, due to misalignment between selected data and the model’s knowledge distribution. To tackle this, we propose Decomposed Difficulty-based Data Selection (3DS), a two-stage model-centric data selection framework that aligns data selection with the model’s distribution. 3DS employs Prompt-Driven Data Selection to filter out noise based on the model’s knowledge via explicit alignment in Stage#1, then adopts Decomposed Difficulty-based Data Selection to guide selection via three novel data difficulty metrics, including Instruction Understanding, Response Confidence, and Response Correctness in Stage#2, enhanced by an attention-based importance weighting mechanism for accurate calibration.Extensive experiments in the healthcare domain show 3DS outperforms existing methods by up to 2.97% accuracy, with additional validation in law and general domains, confirming its generalization ability. Our dataset and code are open-sourced at https://github.com/PuppyKnightUniversity/3DS.