Existing emotional support conversation systems mainly focus on one-on-one seeker-supporter interactions and individual emotional states, leaving interpersonal relations in multi-party scenarios underexplored. In this work, we introduce relation-aware emotional support conversation, a new task that evaluates whether LLMs can capture and utilize the evolving dynamics of relationships to offer more effective emotional support. We construct RESCUE-BENCH (Relation-aware Emotional Support Conversation Understanding and Evaluation Benchmark) from real couple and family interview conversations, containing 191 samples, 7,079 annotated turns, and 1,064.8 minutes of video. Based on rich annotations of socio-emotional and support-related dynamics, RESCUE-BENCH defines six tasks that evaluate two core capabilities required for relation-aware emotional support: Relational Understanding and Relation-Sensitive Support. Experiments with ten LLMs show that current models perform relatively well on tasks relying on local emotional or intervention cues, but struggle with relation-intensive tasks such as relation pattern prediction, viewpoint prediction, and support strategy prediction. These findings reveal the limitations of current LLMs in modeling interpersonal relations and making relation-sensitive support decisions. We release our code and data on Github and Huggingface.

Reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) have generally advanced significantly. However, it is still challenging for existing reasoning-based LLMs to perform effective decision-making abilities in multi-agent environments, due to the absence of explicit foresight modeling. To this end, strategic reasoning, the most fundamental capability to anticipate the counterpart’s behaviors and foresee its possible future actions, has been introduced to alleviate the above issues. Strategic reasoning is fundamental to effective decision-making in multi-agent environments, yet existing reasoning enhancement methods for LLMs do not explicitly capture its foresight nature. In this work, we introduce Foresight Policy Optimization (FoPO) to enhance strategic reasoning in LLMs, which integrates opponent modeling principles into policy optimization, thereby enabling explicit consideration of both self-interest and counterpart influence. Specifically, we construct two curated datasets, namely Cooperative RSA and Competitive Taboo, equipped with well-designed rules and moderate difficulty to facilitate a systematic investigation of FoPO in a self-play framework. Our experiments demonstrate that FoPO significantly enhances strategic reasoning across LLMs of varying sizes and origins. Moreover, models trained with FoPO exhibit strong generalization to out-of-domain strategic scenarios, substantially outperforming standard LLM reasoning optimization baselines.