Large language models increasingly generate environmental discourse, yet there is no standardised framework for evaluating the ecological narratives they produce. We introduce a structured prompt corpus and a reproducible multi layer evaluation framework grounded in ecolinguistic theory, operationalising five dimensions of ecological alignment: anthropocentrism, agency attribution, erasure of non human impacts, evaluation of growth, and responsibility framing. The framework integrates human judgement, an ecosophy aligned model judge, and automated semantic metrics, and is applied to outputs from ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Ecophora, our ecosophy guided model. Ecophora achieves the highest alignment across all layers, with near ceiling judge scores of 159/160 and 142/160, together with the strongest automated composite performance. Divergences between automated metrics and holistic judgement indicate that ecological vocabulary alone does not guarantee ecological reasoning. The proposed framework provides a scalable methodology for benchmarking ecological alignment and assessing narrative shifts in language models.

Leaderboards showcase the current capabilities and limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs). To motivate the development of LLMs that represent the linguistic and cultural diversity of the Spanish-speaking community, we present La Leaderboard, the first open-source leaderboard to evaluate generative LLMs in languages and language varieties of Spain and Latin America. La Leaderboard is a community-driven project that aims to establish an evaluation standard for everyone interested in developing LLMs for the Spanish-speaking community. This initial version combines 66 datasets in Catalan, Basque, Galician, and different Spanish varieties, showcasing the evaluation results of 50 models. To encourage community-driven development of leaderboards in other languages, we explain our methodology, including guidance on selecting the most suitable evaluation setup for each downstream task. In particular, we provide a rationale for using fewer few-shot examples than typically found in the literature, aiming to reduce environmental impact and facilitate access to reproducible results for a broader research community.