Mobile AI acts as a visual oracle, empowering users to snap a picture of something and ask for information. Snap-and-ask retrieval is now one of the most common entry points for mobile AI, yet photos are often blurry, while text questions may be short or mistyped. Existing benchmarks only test on clean inputs or do not isolate paired robustness in snap-and-ask retrieval. Therefore, we introduce SnapBench, the first paired benchmark for robust snap-and-ask multimodal retrieval, spanning 1,145 queries, 9,085 gallery items under 53 controlled corruption conditions with human annotations. We evaluate 16 multimodal retrievers, covering dual-tower encoders and embedding-based VLMs. Results show that image corruptions substantially degrade retrieval, while text corruptions mainly affect text-only retrieval and have limited impact on joint retrieval. Clean image-only retrieval often outperforms joint retrieval, indicating the coarse-text drag and the lack of cross-modal fallback under noisy inputs. SnapBench provides a controlled testbed for evaluating robust retrieval in snap-and-ask scenarios. We further propose MOOR (Modality-anchored, Outlier-aware, Optimal Reweighting), a simple adaptive fusion approach, highlighting the need for reliability-aware modality calibration in snap-and-ask retrieval. The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/zrchen03/SnapBench.

Real-world image search queries are multimodal and compositional: “find this shirt in pink” specifies an entity to retain, an attribute to modify, and context to ignore. Yet existing re-rankers either compress such multi-faceted relevance into an opaque embedding or rely on free-form chain-of-thought that easily omits or hallucinates fine-grained constraints. Drawing on rubric- and checklist-based evaluation from NLP, we recast multimodal image re-ranking as a semantic constraint satisfaction problem and propose EviRank, which parses any query—text-only, image-only, or composed—into a unified evidence package: typed criteria across six semantic slots (e.g., entities, attributes, relations), each labelled required, forbidden, or ignorable. Re-ranking then reduces to evidence-conditioned verification, combining deterministic rubric scoring and evidence-grounded listwise comparison in a single training-free procedure. The explicit evidence can further serve as structured supervision for optionally distilling a lightweight student. Across five benchmarks spanning text-to-image, image-to-image, and composed image retrieval, EviRank achieves state-of-the-art performance, and the distilled student preserves over 90% of the teacher’s capability at substantially lower cost.

Large vision-language models used as listwise rerankers must jointly process visual tokens from tens of candidates per query, making token pruning essential for practical deployment. Existing pruning methods retain tokens by attention saliency, yet we show that saliency is systematically misaligned with ranking contribution: visually prominent tokens often capture order-neutral patterns shared across candidates. This mismatch is layer-dependent: saliency becomes informative only where attention is concentrated, and normalized attention entropy diagnoses the reliability shift (Pearson r=0.87). We propose RaDiCal (Rank-Discriminative Calibration), a training-free framework that uses normalized attention entropy to decide when saliency can be trusted, fusing it with an attention-free rank discriminative prior and se-lecting pruning layers from the same trust landscape. Across three retrieval benchmarks and multiple VLM architectures, RaDiCal matches Dense MRR@10 on Flickr30K and surpasses it on MSCOCO at a 20% token budget, ranks first among all pruning methods on FashionIQ, and holds within 1.2 pp on Flickr30K and MSCOCO at 10% retention. It cuts FLOPs by 39–45% and delivers 1.28–1.45× measured speedups across two VLM architectures without dataset-specific retuning.

Vision-language retrieval with CLIP-style dual encoders achieves strong cross-modal performance, yet practical accuracy often hinges on localized semantic distinctions where top-ranked near misses differ from the true match by a single critical detail. Hard-sample mining can select confusable candidates but cannot construct corrected counterparts; synthetic augmentation can generate novel samples but, without conditioning on actual model failures, targets irrelevant dimensions of hardness. We observe that a top-ranked false positive is a counterfactual scaffold—sharing most of the query’s semantics while differing in a localized failure-causing residual. Minimally correcting this residual yields a hard positive of the ground truth in the same modality; the corrected and unedited versions form a hard negative pair that straddles the decision boundary, producing complementary pull–push supervision. We introduce RePair, guided by three principles—Validity, Minimality, and Locality—which mines false positives bidirectionally, applies LLM-guided counterfactual editing, and trains with a local hard-pair contrastive objective. On Flickr30K and COCO30K, RePair outperforms controlled augmentation baselines with only 107K synthetic samples—26%–75% fewer than comparable methods—confirming failure-conditioned repair is more data-efficient than error-agnostic augmentation.