VLM-driven self-improvement of web code has a structural flaw: the model that proposes the repair is the model that judges it, and visual plausibility under that judge is a poor proxy for whether the page actually works. What the loop is missing is a counterparty the VLM cannot fool, and the browser already is that counterparty: a deterministic, executable simulator of how an HTML artifact behaves under user actions, and in everything but name a world model for web code. We present WEBWORLD, the interface that lets a VLM prior interact with this browser-as-world-model autonomously and decides which interactions become supervision. Each round, the VLM emits a critique that the planner compiles into a typed interaction contract; the browser re-executes the candidate and issues an acceptance certificate only when both target progress and preservation of every previously verified capability hold; certified transitions accumulate as a quality ratchet that is the only thing the SFT export ever sees. Under matched training, WEBWORLD-27B improves Raw-27B by 5.3 points on HTMLBench-400 and 14.9 points on MiniAppBench-Val, and reaches the level of strong frontier systems such as Kimi-K2.6 and GPT-5.4 on interactive HTML generation. Equal-size ablations show that browser-backed admission carries the gain: without the certificate, the matched 9B lift nearly disappears.

Industrial code tasks, including chip design, GPU optimization, and firmware, often fail for reasons that are invisible in ordinary source code: timing constraints, backend logs, layout data, simulator behavior, and hardware-specific performance trade-offs. Current code models see many programs but few expert correction traces from these settings. We present InCoder-32B-Thinking, a 32B thinking code model trained with Error-driven Chain-of-Thought (ECoT) synthesis and an Industrial Code World Model (ICWM). ECoT converts several rounds of toolchain signals into reasoning traces by preserving the failed code, the observed failure, and the later fix. ICWM learns from execution traces in domains such as Verilog simulation and GPU profiling, then predicts feedback for the data engine, which can build more repair traces without routing every candidate through a real toolchain. The data keeps the uneven reasoning depth of industrial work: short traces for simple cases, long traces for hardware-level debugging. Across 23 tests (14 general and 9 industrial), InCoder-32B-Thinking reaches 81.3% on LiveCodeBench v5, 84.0% CAD-Coder compile success, and 38.0% on KernelBench L2, while remaining competitive on general coding tasks. Model weights and code are available at Hugging Face: https://huggingface.co/Multilingual-Multimodal-NLP/IndustrialCoder and GitHub: https://github.com/CSJianYang/Industrial-Coder.