Large language models (LLMs) perform strongly across tasks and languages, yet how improvements in one task or language affect other tasks and languages remains poorly understood. We conduct a controlled LoRA fine-tuning study across multiple open-weight LLM families and scales, using a standardised grid of 11 languages and four benchmarks. We fine-tune each model on a single task–language source, then evaluate it on all other task–language target pairs to measure transfer. We decompose transfer into three regimes: (i) Matched-Task (Cross-Language), (ii) Cross-Task (Matched-Language), and (iii) Cross-Task (Cross-Language). Single-source fine-tuning yields a net positive uplift across regimes, but the gains are strongly asymmetric. Matched-Task (Cross-Language) transfer emerges as the most effective and structurally regular regime, with transfer magnitude driven principally by the identity of the target language rather than model architecture. We identify a stable coarse-grained hierarchy in which some task and language targets consistently absorb gains from diverse sources, while others remain relatively isolated. These results imply that effective fine-tuning requires accounting for donor–recipient roles to maximise downstream gains while limiting collateral degradation in other capabilities.