Katharina Soemer
Author directory2026
Who’s Behind It? Annotating and Extracting Conspiratorial Actors from German Telegram Posts
Helena Mihaljevic | Jolanda Beer | Mareike Lisker | Katharina Soemer
Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH)
Helena Mihaljevic | Jolanda Beer | Mareike Lisker | Katharina Soemer
Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH)
Conspiracy theories commonly attribute important events to the actions of powerful and secretive actors. While computational research has largely focused on document-level analyses of conspiracy theories, less attention has been paid to identifying the actors portrayed as responsible in such narratives. We develop detailed guidelines for the span-level annotation of conspiratorial actors and use them to create a corpus of German Telegram posts, before investigating automatic actor extraction using transformer-based models. We further apply the resulting model to the Schwurbelarchiv, a large-scale archive of German conspiracy-related Telegram channels. Our results demonstrate that conspiratorial actors can be annotated consistently and extracted with reasonable accuracy despite the linguistic complexity of conspiracy discourse, enabling large-scale analyses of actor representations in conspiracy narratives.
You Frame It: How Conceptual Representations Shape LLM Detection and Reasoning about Antisemitism
Katharina Soemer | Helena Mihaljevic
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Katharina Soemer | Helena Mihaljevic
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
LLMs enable the integration of external conceptual resources at inference time, creating new opportunities for detecting ideologically and historically complex phenomena such as antisemitism. We investigate how different forms of conceptual grounding affect antisemitism detection and explanation behavior across four state-of-the-art LLMs. Using two expert-annotated datasets, we compare definitional, fine-grained taxonomic, example-augmented, and large-context representations of antisemitism. We find that fine-grained taxonomic representations substantially improve recall, while simultaneously reducing precision. Surprisingly, supplying substantially larger conceptual resources yields no additional quantitative benefit. Post-Holocaust antisemitism poses the most persistent challenge across models and configurations. Analysis of explanations further reveals systematic limitations including overproduction of conceptual references, reliance on lexical cues, overconfidence, and difficulties with subtle or justificatory forms of antisemitism. Our findings highlight both the potential and the remaining limitations of conceptually grounded LLMs for antisemitism detection and reasoning.