Large language models (LLMs) excel at semantic understanding, yet their ability to reconstruct internal structure from scrambled inputs remains underexplored. Sentence-level restoration is difficult to evaluate automatically because scrambled sentences often admit multiple valid reorderings. We introduce OrderProbe, a deterministic benchmark for structural reconstruction using fixed four-character expressions in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean, which have a unique canonical order and thus support exact-match scoring. We further propose a diagnostic framework that evaluates models beyond recovery accuracy, including Semantic Accuracy, Logical Validity, Structural Consistency, Robustness, and Information Density. Experiments on twelve widely used LLMs show that structural reconstruction remains difficult even for frontier systems: zero-shot recovery frequently falls below 35%. We also observe a consistent gap between meaning-oriented generation and exact structural reconstruction, suggesting that structural robustness is not an automatic byproduct of semantic competence.

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success in difficult purely textual mathematical reasoning tasks, even advanced closed-source models such as GPT-o3 still struggle with geometric problems. This discrepancy motivates us to investigate the root cause: is the bottleneck of multimodal geometric reasoning rooted in reasoning itself, or in the perception of geometric information from diagrams? To answer this question, we conduct an exploratory experiment and find that providing high-quality captions consistently and substantially boosts performance of MLLMs, empirically validating the visual perception bottleneck in geometric reasoning. However, MLLMs’ capabilities in visual geometric perception remain insufficiently evaluated. To fill the gap, we propose CapGeo-Bench, a benchmark of 4,641 high-quality figure–caption pairs equipped with a fine-grained keypoint-based evaluation metric. Specifically, CapGeo-Bench encompasses three geometric classes and is devided into four difficulty levels according to the complexity of geometric primitives. Captions are scored at a fine-grained level by extracting keypoints along three dimensions-geometric elements, spatial relationships, and numerical attributes. CapGeo-Bench provides a reliable instrument and guideline for evaluating and advancing MLLMs’ geometric perception capabilities. Our code and data are publicly available at: https://github.com/YuYingLi0/CapGeo.

Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) drives chain-of-thought reasoning in large language models, yet its binary outcome reward cannot distinguish among correct trajectories. Existing dense reward alternatives, from surface heuristics to process reward models, either ignore the expert solutions already present in training corpora or require expensive offline annotation. We propose Gradient-Aligned Reward (GAR), which operates in the policy’s own gradient space: truncated backpropagation through the output projection layer extracts a compact gradient vector for each rollout, and cosine similarity with an expert-anchor gradient yields a dense, reasoning-aware reward with less than 9% wall-clock overhead. We prove that this cosine admits a multiplicative decomposition into prediction-error and activation-pattern factors, providing a concrete characterization of what the alignment signal measures. On Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B, GAR consistently improves over GRPO and other baselines on competition-level math benchmarks and transfers to GPQA Diamond and MMLU-Pro without domain-specific data. Code and data are available at https://github.com/LQgdwind/GAR .

The application of autonomous agents to scientific literature review is often constrained by the reliability of online search infrastructures and linear text generation. To address these limitations, we introduce SciLENS (Scientific Localized Evidence Navigation and Synthesis), an autonomous agent framework operating entirely upon a localized dual-tier data infrastructure for deterministic access to massive academic corpora. To mitigate online dependency, SciLENS utilizes a comprehensive offline toolbox featuring topological graph traversal and structural visualization. This empowers the agent to navigate deep citation networks and organize macro-level trends into structured visual representations, mitigating context exhaustion. To train this system without human annotation, we develop an automated multi-hop data synthesis pipeline validated by cross-model consensus, followed by rubric-based reinforcement learning to align the logical planning of the agent. Evaluations across standard tasks and newly constructed complex synthesis benchmarks demonstrate that SciLENS achieves robust factual precision, outperforming existing open-source baselines and achieving performance comparable to frontier proprietary models. Our source code and data are released at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SciLENS-48DB .

Criminal judgment prediction requires models to infer statutory articles, charges, and sentencing outcomes from case facts. Unlike standard classification tasks, it involves a structured reasoning process in which statutes should be matched with facts, charges should be justified by statutes, and sentencing outcomes should remain consistent with charges. Existing approaches optimize final labels, and while some have attempted to evaluate reasoning quality, their evaluations are indirect, often relying on LLM-generated rubrics that reflect model-internal preferences rather than the inherent logical structure of legal adjudication. We propose Juris Policy Optimization (JPO), a post-training framework for structured legal reasoning in Chinese criminal judgment prediction. JPO first uses teacher-generated rationales to supervise a standardized four-step reasoning process, and then applies reinforcement learning with a composite reward over legal prediction quality, reasoning structure completeness, and cross-step consistency. JPO further introduces token-level advantage reweighting and adaptive clipping for legally salient reasoning segments. Experiments on multiple open-source language models and three Chinese legal benchmarks show that JPO consistently improves both judgment prediction and reasoning quality over supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning baselines.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in code generation across various domains. However, their ability to replicate complex, multi-panel visualizations from real-world data remains largely unassessed. To address this gap, we introduce RealChart2Code, a new large-scale benchmark with over 2,800 instances grounded in authentic datasets and featuring tasks with clear analytical intent. Crucially, it is the first benchmark to systematically evaluate chart generation from large-scale raw data and assess iterative code refinement in a multi-turn conversational setting. Our comprehensive evaluation of 14 leading VLMs on RealChart2Code reveals significant performance degradation compared to simpler benchmarks, highlighting their struggles with complex plot structures and authentic data. Our analysis uncovers a substantial performance gap between proprietary and open-weight models and confirms that even state-of-the-art VLMs often fail to accurately replicate intricate, multi-panel charts. These findings provide valuable insights into the current limitations of VLMs and guide future research directions.

A core barrier preventing recommender systems from reaching their full potential lies in the inherent limitations of user-item interaction data: (1) Sparse user-item interactions, making it difficult to learn reliable user preferences; (2) Traditional contrastive learning methods often treat negative samples as equally hard or easy, ignoring the informative semantic difficulty during training. (3) Modern LLM-based recommender systems, on the other hand, discard all negative feedback, leading to unbalanced preference modeling. To address these issues, we propose LAGCL4Rec, a framework leveraging Large Language Models to Activate interactions in Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation. Our approach operates through three stages: (i) Data-Level: augmenting sparse interactions with balanced positive and negative samples using LLM-enriched profiles; (ii) Rank-Level: assessing semantic difficulty of negative samples through LLM-based grouping for fine-grained contrastive learning; and (iii) Rerank-Level: reasoning over augmented historical interactions for personalized recommendations. Theoretical analysis proves that LAGCL4Rec achieves effective information utilization with minimal computational overhead. Experiments across multiple benchmarks confirm our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.