Breast cancer care requires multimodal reasoning across a clinical workflow spanning screening, diagnosis, and treatment planning. However, existing medical MLLMs are typically limited to isolated modalities or narrow task settings, restricting their ability to support workflow-level clinical reasoning. To address this gap, we introduce BreastStage, a workflow-aligned breast imaging instruction corpus containing 1.86M instruction-following pairs from 17 sub-datasets, 5 imaging modalities, and 136 task templates, together with BreastStage-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating multimodal reasoning across the breast cancer care continuum. Built upon this corpus, we propose BreastGPT, a unified MLLM with a dual-branch visual encoder and concept-preserving token compression to bridge standard radiology and gigapixel pathology. On BreastStage-Bench, BreastGPT achieves 75.66% closed-ended accuracy and 89.92% open-ended score, outperforming both general-purpose and medical-specific MLLMs across clinical stages and task formats. Data, code, and model checkpoints are publicly released at https://anonymous.4open.science/w/BreastGPT_io/.

Volumetric medical VQA requires reasoning over long and redundant 3D visual token sequences, especially in multi-sequence MRI where complementary modalities provide diverse diagnostic cues but expose the decoder to many repeated anatomical regions. To investigate reasoning under multi-sequence visual redundancy, we first introduce BreMRIs-VQA, a clinically curated breast MRI benchmark with 1.19M QA pairs from 71.0K sequences and 12.9K patients, covering both free-text and multiple-choice questions. We further propose SeVeR, a selective visual exposure framework that compresses dense volumes into modality-wise prototypes and retrieves complementary multi-level evidence with change-aware gated attention during decoding, trained with a marginal-utility self-consistency objective that suppresses unhelpful retrieval. Experiments on BreMRIs-VQA and public benchmarks show that SeVeR improves both discriminative and generative performance while exposing substantially fewer visual tokens.

The evaluation of generated reports remains a critical challenge in Computed Tomography (CT) report generation, due to the large volume of text, the diversity and complexity of findings, and the presence of fine-grained, disease-oriented attributes. Conventional evaluation metrics offer only coarse measures of lexical overlap or entity matching and fail to reflect the granular diagnostic accuracy required for clinical use. To address this gap, we propose CT-FineBench, a benchmark built from CT-RATE and Merlin to evaluate the fine-grained factual consistency of CT reports, constructed from CT-RATE and Merlin. Our benchmark is constructed through a meticulous, Question-Answering (QA) based process: first, we identify and structure key, finding-specific clinical attributes (e.g., location, size, margin). Second, we systematically transform these attributes into a QA dataset, where questions probe for specific clinical details grounded in gold-standard reports. The evaluation protocol for CT-FineBench involves using this QA dataset to query a machine-generated report and scoring the correctness of the answers. This allows for a comprehensive, interpretable, and clinically-relevant assessment, moving beyond superficial lexical overlap to pinpoint specific clinical errors. Experiments show that CT-FineBench correlates better with expert clinical assessment and is substantially more sensitive to fine-grained factual errors than prior metrics.