Linhao Wang
Author directory2026
BlueprintAgent: Constraint-Triggered Targeted Revisits for Simulation-Ready Generation from Scanned Structural Blueprints
Zhouyuan Xu | Chen Yang | Linhao Wang | Jiansheng Fan | Chen Wang
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Zhouyuan Xu | Chen Yang | Linhao Wang | Jiansheng Fan | Chen Wang
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Converting in-service reinforced-concrete (RC) building blueprints into simulation-ready models underpins safety assessment and seismic retrofit, but the process remains largely manual. Direct prompting of a multimodal large language model (MLLM) over a full scanned sheet is unreliable: plausible-looking outputs often violate engineering constraints on beam–column support, span count, or 3D continuity.We present BlueprintAgent (BPA), a constraint-triggered multimodal agent for simulation-ready frame extraction from scanned blueprints. BPA treats the MLLM as the primary reader and decision maker, with OCR and computer vision supplying localized evidence. Its novelty is not the tool stack but a control mechanism: engineering constraints are realized as callable validators whose entity-level conflict reports trigger targeted MLLM revisits over the relevant local region—an inference-time control distinct from fixed pipelines and free-form self-reflection.We evaluate BPA on 300 real scanned blueprint sheets from 20 anonymized RC frame projects, against five baselines and six ablations. BPA reaches a macro-averaged Beam F1 of 0.994, against 0.301 for single-MLLM zero-shot and 0.820 for a fixed pipeline; removing MLLM-led axis adjudication collapses Beam and Column F1 on complex multi-sheet projects. For dense technical drawings, engineering constraints are best deployed as triggers for entity-level targeted revisits rather than as post-hoc output filters.
A Survey on Entropy Mechanism in Large Reasoning Models
Zihan Wang | Xingle Xu | Hao Wang | Yiwen Ye | Yuchen Li | Linhao Wang | Hongze Tan | Peidong Wang | Shi Feng | Guoqing Chen | Jinghao Lin | Zijing Wang | Yiqun Zhang | Yongkang Liu | Xiaocui Yang | Tao Yan | Lei Yang | Shengzhi Wang | Yuhang Wu | Ge Yu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Zihan Wang | Xingle Xu | Hao Wang | Yiwen Ye | Yuchen Li | Linhao Wang | Hongze Tan | Peidong Wang | Shi Feng | Guoqing Chen | Jinghao Lin | Zijing Wang | Yiqun Zhang | Yongkang Liu | Xiaocui Yang | Tao Yan | Lei Yang | Shengzhi Wang | Yuhang Wu | Ge Yu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Entropy mechanism emerges as a key organizing principle for understanding and improving Large Reasoning Models (LRMs). This survey examines how entropy shapes both their training and inference behavior. On the training side, we take a mathematical perspective: casting existing RL-based reasoning algorithms into a unified objective and using this formulation to derive an entropy-centric decomposition of methods, clarifying how different approaches adjust exploration–exploitation "knobs". On the inference side, based on the characteristic of LRM that trading increased inference tokens yields better performance, we summarize methods that leverage entropy to enhance inference performance or reduce uncertainty. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future directions of entropy-driven research for LRMs. Our repository is available on https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Awesome_LRM_with_Entropy-0503.