Language Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance by scaling test-time computation but often suffer from “overthinking”, producing excessively long reasoning traces that increase latency and memory usage. Existing LRMs typically enforce conciseness with uniform length penalties, which over-compress crucial early deduction steps at the sequence level and indiscriminately penalize all queries at the group level. To solve these limitations, we propose PACE, a dual-level framework for prefix-protected and difficulty-aware compression under hierarchical supervision. At the sequence level, prefix-protected optimization employs decaying mixed rollouts to maintain valid reasoning paths while promoting conciseness. At the group level, difficulty-aware penalty dynamically scales length constraints based on query complexity, maintaining exploration for harder questions while curbing redundancy on easier ones. Extensive experiments on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen (1.5B/7B) demonstrate that PACE achieves a substantial reduction in token usage (up to 55.7%) while simultaneously improving accuracy (up to 4.1%) on math benchmarks, with generalization ability to code, science, and general domains.

While prior work focuses on treating answer verification as a general reasoning or semantic matching problem, significant challenges remain in computation-oriented scientific domains. In this paper, we introduce CoSineVerifier, an agentic verifier that actively invokes external executors to ground its judgments in precise computations and symbolic reasoning. To train this accurate agentic verifier, we propose a novel verifier training data augmentation method to increase the correctness and efficiency of tool-invoked verifications. Extensive experiments across STEM, QA, and long-form reasoning tasks demonstrate CoSineVerifier’s robust generalization abilities, achieving state-of-the-art performance on VerifyBench-Hard and SCI-Bench. Furthermore, when employed as an RLVR reward model, CoSineVerifier consistently outperforms both rubric- and model-based verifiers on AIME’24, AIME’25 and GPQA-D, highlighting its potential to advance LLM reasoning and accelerate data processing

With the continued proliferation of Large Language Model (LLM) based chatbots, there is a growing demand for generating responses that are not only linguistically fluent but also consistently aligned with persona-specific traits in conversations. However, existing role-play and persona-based chat approaches rely heavily on static role descriptions, coarse-grained signal space, and low-quality synthetic data, which fail to capture dynamic fine-grained details in human-like chat. Human-like chat requires modeling subtle latent traits, such as emotional tone, situational awareness, and evolving personality, which are difficult to predefine and cannot be easily learned from synthetic or distillation-based data. To address these limitations, we propose a Verbal Variational Auto-Encoding (V-VAE) framework, containing a variational auto-encoding module and fine-grained control space which dynamically adapts dialogue behaviour based on fine-grained, interpretable latent variables across talking style, interaction patterns, and personal attributes. We also construct a high-quality dataset, HumanChatData, and benchmark HumanChatBench to address the scarcity of high-quality data in the human-like domain. Experiments show that LLMs based on V-VAE consistently outperform standard baselines on HumanChatBench and DialogBench, which further demonstrates the effectiveness of V-VAE and HumanChatData.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various tasks, yet they often exhibit a specific cultural bias, neglecting the values and linguistic diversity of low-resource regions. This cultural bias not only undermines universal equality but also risks reinforcing stereotypes and perpetuating discrimination. To address this, we propose CulFiT, a novel culturally-aware training paradigm that leverages multilingual data and fine-grained reward modeling to enhance cultural sensitivity and inclusivity. Our approach synthesizes diverse cultural-related questions, constructs critique data in multiple culturally relevant languages, and employs fine-grained rewards to decompose cultural texts into verifiable knowledge units for interpretable evaluation. We also introduce GlobalOpinionQA, a multilingual open-ended question-answering dataset designed to evaluate culturally-aware responses in a global context. Extensive experiments on three existing benchmarks and our GlobalOpinionQA demonstrate that CulFiT achieves state-of-the-art open-source model performance in cultural alignment and general reasoning.