We investigate the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in multi-author style change detection. Using off-the-shelf LLMs or supervised fine-tuning solely within the target domain fails to yield effective features; for this reason, we propose cross-domain transfer learning with LLM-based embeddings fine-tuned for authorship verification. We fine-tune Mistral-7B embedding model and compare it with DeBERTa, used in the the state-of-the-art (SOTA) systems in PAN-25 multi-author writing style analysis challenge. Results show that DeBERTa and Mistral excel in different user-generated text scenarios. We exploit this diversity by combining both embeddings, leading to more effective style change detection.

With the growing need for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) and their applications to speech, challenges persist in summarizing and evaluating conversations that lack a clear end goal. We introduce SAUCE – a reference-free, fact-based evaluation pipeline for cross-lingual conversational speech summarization. It measures the accuracy and the fact coverage of a summary through the entailment between conversation and text. We compare SAUCE against several popular summarization metrics and demonstrate the effectiveness of capturing information loss due to transcription and translation error and identifying broken summaries. Crucially, unlike black-box LLM evaluators or dense embedding metrics, SAUCE is inherently explainable: it maps summary scores to discrete, verifiable facts, allowing users to pinpoint exact hallucinations or omissions. We illustrate how this interpretability helps developers systematically profile LLM behaviors and gives end-users an actionable tool to verify summary accuracy in noisy, real-world conditions. Preliminary investigations show SAUCE strongly align with human judgment.