The evaluation of societal biases in NLP models is critically hindered by a geo-cultural gap. This leaves regions such as Latin America severely underserved, making it impossible to adequately assess or mitigate the perpetuation of harmful regional stereotypes in language technologies. This paper presents LACES, a stereotype association dataset, for 15 Latin American countries. This dataset includes 4,789 stereotype associations[The de-identified dataset can be accessed via GitHub], manually created and annotated by 83 participants. The dataset was developed through targeted community partnerships across Latin America. Additionally, in this paper, we propose a novel adaptive data collection methodology that uniquely integrates the sourcing of new stereotype entries and the validation of existing data within a single, unified workflow. This approach results in a resource with more unique stereotypes than previous static collection methods, enabling a more efficient stereotype collection. The paper further supports the quality of LACES by demonstrating reduced efficacy of debiasing methods on this dataset in comparison to existing popular stereotype benchmarks.Content Warning: This research involves the study of social biases. Consequently, the paper contains examples of discriminatory language and stereotypes that may be sensitive or upsetting to readers. These examples are included for the purpose of scientific analysis and do not reflect the views of the authors.

Current multilingual benchmarks cover only a fraction of the languages represented in modern pretraining corpora and often conflate language proficiency with the ability to answer questions grounded in specific regions and communities. We introduce INCLUDE-2.0, a large-scale benchmark for region-aware multilingual factual evaluation, which covers 91 languages from 86 countries (127 total language–country pairs), comprising over 220K curated samples drawn from native regional sources. Unlike existing benchmarks that often treat language as a proxy for region, IINCLUDE-2.0 distinguishes between questions whose answers are independent of context, vary by country, concern widely documented facts about a place, or depend on knowledge primarily expressed through local linguistic and cultural sources. Each item is annotated with its regional knowledge type and domain, and paired with an English translation, enabling controlled analysis of the relationship between language proficiency and possession of regional knowledge.

Evaluating frontier and open-weight models on IINCLUDE-2.0, we find that aggregate multilingual accuracy masks substantial variation across regional knowledge types, languages, and regions. We find that frontier models perform worse on locally embedded knowledge than on widely documented facts about regions, with an average drop of ~14.5 points. We also show that for open-weight models, scale improves accuracy but does not reliably make performance invariant to whether a question is asked in English or its original language. INCLUDE-2.0 is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/epfl-nlp/include-2.0

Most resources for evaluating social biases in Large Language Models are developed without co-design from the communities affected by these biases, and rarely involve participatory approaches. We introduce HESEIA, a dataset of 46,499 sentences created in a professional development course. The course involved 370 high-school teachers and 5,370 students from 189 Latin-American schools. Unlike existing benchmarks, HESEIA captures intersectional biases across multiple demographic axes and school subjects. It reflects local contexts through the lived experience and pedagogical expertise of educators. Teachers used minimal pairs to create sentences that express stereotypes relevant to their school subjects and communities. We show the dataset diversity in term of demographic axes represented and also in terms of the knowledge areas included. We demonstrate that the dataset contains more stereotypes unrecognized by current LLMs than previous datasets. HESEIA is available to support bias assessments grounded in educational communities.