Mary Katie Kennedy
Author directoryAlso published as: Mary Kennedy
2026
Miss Universal Grammar: Pretraining BabyLMs with Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Sources
Erika Varis Doggett | Mary Kennedy
Proceedings of the Second BabyLM Workshop
Erika Varis Doggett | Mary Kennedy
Proceedings of the Second BabyLM Workshop
Inspired by linguistic theory and recent work exploring linguistic biasing of neural networks, we propose a “Universal Grammar” (UG) pretraining paradigm for transformer-based neural networks, preparing the network to learn language more effectively, especially in low data volume scenarios. We accomplish this “universal” pretraining with a combination of synthetic language-like sequences created with a context-free grammar, biological sequence sources like protein amino acids, and material sources like crystal structures. Experiments with the BabyLM Challenge datasets show improved language acquisition in English, Dutch, and Chinese with our MissUniverse models, compared to not using “UG” pretraining. This pretraining paradigm has interesting implications for both the future of language models, and potentially how we think about human Universal Grammar.
2025
Evidence of Hierarchically-Complex Syntactic Structure Within BERT’s Word Representations
Mary Katie Kennedy
Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics 2025
Mary Katie Kennedy
Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics 2025
Evidence of Generative Syntax in Large Language Models
Mary Katie Kennedy
Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning
Mary Katie Kennedy
Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning
The syntactic probing literature has been largely limited to shallow structures like dependency trees, which are unable to capture the subtle differences in sub-surface syntactic structures that yield semantic nuances. These structures are captured by theories of syntax like generative syntax, but have not been researched in the LLM literature due to the difficulties in probing these complex structures with many silent, covert nodes. Our work presents a method for overcoming this limitation by deploying Hewitt and Manning’s (2019) dependency-trained probe on sentence constructions whose structural representation is identical in a dependency parse, but differs in theoretical syntax. If a pretrained language model has captured the theoretical syntax structure, then the probe’s predicted distances should vary in syntactically-predicted ways. Using this methodology and a novel dataset, we find evidence that LLMs have captured syntactic structures far richer than previously realized, indicating LLMs are able to capture the nuanced meanings that result from sub-surface differences in structural form.