High-performance GPU kernels are essential for efficient LLM deployment, yet optimizing them remains expertise-intensive. Recent LLM-based code generation makes automatic GPU operator generation promising, but operator optimization remains a hardware-aware search problem. Existing LLM-based methods face a granularity mismatch: coarse hints are reusable but hard to execute, whereas detailed memories are actionable but enlarge the search space and obscure optimization bottlenecks. The key challenge is therefore to organize optimization experience at an appropriate granularity. To address this issue, this paper proposes HTAM (Hierarchical Transition-Attended Memory), a coarse-to-fine framework for LLM-based operator optimization. HTAM builds a two-level Hierarchical Transition Graph (HTG) to organize coarse global directions, detailed local strategies, and transition experience between optimization steps. During each evolution step, HTAM selects a global direction from the current state and recent optimization history, retrieves the corresponding local strategy memory, and uses it to guide concrete CUDA code generation. Experiments on the full KernelBench suite demonstrate that HTAM consistently improves correctness, fast-solution rate, and speedup over LLM-based baselines, while backend and Robust-KBench studies indicate transferable benefits from structured memory.

Agentic Reinforcement Learning (ARL) trains large language models to interleave reasoning with external tool execution to solve complex tasks. Most existing ARL methods train a single set of parameters to support both reasoning and tool-use behaviors, implicitly assuming that joint training leads to improved overall agent performance. Despite its widespread adoption, this assumption has rarely been examined empirically. In this paper, we systematically examine this assumption by introducing Capability Effect Attribution (CEA), which provides quantitative evidence of interference between reasoning and tool-use behaviors. Through an in-depth analysis, we show that these two capabilities often induce misaligned gradient directions, leading to training interference that undermines the effectiveness of joint optimization and challenges the prevailing ARL paradigm. To address this issue, we propose Disentangled Action–Reasoning Tuning (DART), a simple and efficient framework that explicitly decouples parameter updates for reasoning and tool use via separate low-rank adaptation modules. With this simple change alone, DART outperforms all joint-optimization baselines and approaches the 2-Agent upper bound across thirteen benchmarks on retrieval-augmented QA and NL2SQL, further supporting our finding of capability interference under shared optimization.