Automatic classification of literary text by historical era can support literary analysis and reveal stylistic evolution. We study this problem for Urdu poetry across three eras, classical, modern, and contemporary. We introduce a new dataset of 10,026 four-line Urdu poetry segments collected from online archives (Rekhta and UrduPoint) and labeled by era. To handle Urdu’s script and orthographic variability, we apply standard preprocessing, including Unicode normalization and removal of diacritics and non-Urdu characters. We benchmark a range of approaches, from traditional machine learning classifiers to deep learning models, including fine-tuned Urdu BERT-style transformers. To assess generalization, we evaluate under two regimes: (i) a standard stratified random split and (ii) a stricter author-disjoint split that ensures poets do not overlap between training and test sets. On the random split, the best traditional models achieve about 70-73% accuracy, suggesting era-related stylistic cues are learnable. However, performance drops to roughly 58-60% under the author-disjoint split, highlighting the difficulty in generalizing across unseen poets and the possibility of overestimating performance via author-specific leakage. Notably, fine-tuned transformers do not surpass simpler TF-IDF-based baselines, indicating that era cues may be subtle and that data limitations constrain more complex models.

Sentiment analysis in low-resource languages such as Urdu poses unique challenges due to limited annotated data, morphological complexity, and significant class imbalance in most publicly available datasets. This study addresses these issues through two experimental strategies. First, we explore class imbalance mitigation by using instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic negative sentiment samples in Urdu. This augmentation strategy results in a more balanced dataset, which significantly improves the recall and F1-score for minority class predictions when fine-tuned using a multilingual BERT model. Second, we investigate the effectiveness of translating Urdu text into English and applying sentiment classification through a pre-trained English language model. Comparative evaluation reveals that the translation-based pipeline, using a RoBERTa model fine-tuned for English sentiment classification, achieves superior performance across major metrics. Our results suggest that LLM-based augmentation and cross-lingual transfer via translation both serve as viable approaches to overcome data scarcity and performance limitations in sentiment analysis for low-resource languages. The findings highlight the potential applicability of these approaches to other under-resourced linguistic domains.