Noriko Takahashi
2026
Challenges in Japanese Euphemism Classification: An Analysis of Pretrained Japanese and Multilingual Models
Noriko Takahashi | Whitney Poh | Libby Barak | Jing Peng | Anna Feldman
Proceedings of Learning Non-Literal Expressions with Small Data @ LREC 2026
Noriko Takahashi | Whitney Poh | Libby Barak | Jing Peng | Anna Feldman
Proceedings of Learning Non-Literal Expressions with Small Data @ LREC 2026
Euphemisms present a persistent challenge for NLP because their interpretation depends on pragmatic inference, social norms, and contextual cues rather than surface meaning alone. Although Potentially Euphemistic Terms (PET)-based resources have been developed for several languages, Japanese euphemisms remain computationally unexplored despite their close interaction with honorifics, register variation, and orthographic choice. We introduce JP-PET, the first PET-based dataset for Japanese euphemism classification, comprising 1,672 annotated sentences across 101 PETs and ten semantic domains with register metadata. We evaluate two Japanese monolingual transformer models (Rinna RoBERTa and Tohoku BERT) and the multilingual XLM-R under three controlled PET-level data splits that isolate lexical familiarity and generalization to unseen euphemisms. While models achieve strong performance when PETs are shared between training and test data, performance drops substantially under PET-disjoint conditions, indicating reliance on lexical familiarity. Error analysis reveals systematic challenges in politically conventionalized expressions, metaphor-based euphemisms, and orthographic mitigation strategies. JP-PET provides the first benchmark for studying pragmatic meaning in Japanese NLP.
2025
Evaluating the Reliability of Human–AI Collaborative Scoring of Written Arguments Using Rational Force Model
Noriko Takahashi | Abraham Onuorah | Alina Reznitskaya | Evgeny Chukharev | Ariel Sykes | Michele Flammia | Joe Oyler
Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Measurement and Education Conference (AIME-Con): Works in Progress
Noriko Takahashi | Abraham Onuorah | Alina Reznitskaya | Evgeny Chukharev | Ariel Sykes | Michele Flammia | Joe Oyler
Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Measurement and Education Conference (AIME-Con): Works in Progress
This study aims to improve the reliability of a new AI collaborative scoring system used to assess the quality of students’ written arguments. The system draws on the Rational Force Model and focuses on classifying the functional relation of each proposition in terms of support, opposition, acceptability, and relevance.