The present study evaluates CEFR-based text complexity for Ukrainian using a new dataset compiled from textbooks, designed for language learners. We compare traditional machine learning, transformer-based models, and LLM-based evaluation across A1–B2 language proficiency levels. Results show that explicit linguistic features remain highly effective: a Random Forest classifier achieves the highest macro-F1 (0.576), slightly outperforming fine-tuned XLM-RoBERTa (0.574). While GPT-5.5 shows strong performance (macro-F1 0.564), marking a significant advancement over GPT-4.1, supervised models achieve slightly better scores in this experiment for the proficiency-level assessment. These findings suggest that structured linguistic analysis is a robust alternative to purely neural approaches for Ukrainian CEFR classification.

Analyzing code-switching – the practice of mixing multiple languages in one discourse – remains a significant task in natural language processing (NLP). This study examines the Ukrainian-Russian bilingual context, focusing on quantifying language alternation in a multilingual dataset. We introduce metrics to assess linguistic boundaries and patterns, specifically addressing the complexities of processing texts where Ukrainian and Russian are used interchangeably, including word-level hybridization. Using a corpus of approximately 200,000 tokens derived from parliamentary transcripts (1990-2021), we apply code-switching metrics to identify frequency and patterns of language use. Our findings provide insights into bilingual communication dynamics and can be used to improve language identification models for mixed-language data.

This paper presents the development of a corpus of annotated multiword expressions (MWEs) for Ukrainian. The resource covers four major categories of MWEs: verbal, nominal, adjectival/adverbial, and functional. We describe the methodology used for data selection, the annotation scheme, and the procedures employed during annotation. In addition, the paper discusses some specific types of MWE constructions, illustrating their usage with numerous examples and addressing complex and borderline cases. The resulting corpus is an important resource for linguistic studies and NLP tasks involving MWEs, and is publicly accessible https://gitlab.com/parseme/sharedtask-data/-/tree/master/2.0?ref_type=heads.

Potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs) carry meanings inherently tied to the everyday experience of a given language community. As such, they constitute an interesting challenge for assessing the linguistic (and to some extent cultural) capabilities of NLP systems. In this paper, we present XMPIE, a parallel multilingual and multimodal dataset of potentially idiomatic expressions. The dataset, containing 34 languages and over ten thousand items, allows comparative analyses of idiomatic patterns among language-specific realisations and preferences in order to gather insights about shared cultural aspects. This parallel dataset allows evaluation of language model performance for a given PIE in different languages and whether idiomatic understanding in one language can be transferred to another. Moreover, the dataset supports the study of PIEs across textual and visual modalities, to measure to what extent PIE understanding in one modality transfers or implies in understanding in another modality (text vs. image). The data was created by language experts, with both textual and visual components crafted under multilingual guidelines, and each PIE is accompanied by five images representing a spectrum from idiomatic to literal meanings, including semantically related and random distractors. The result is a high-quality benchmark for evaluating multilingual and multimodal idiomatic language understanding.

We present edition 2.0 of the PARSEME multilingual corpus annotated for multiword expressions (MWEs), resulting from efforts of the PARSEME community towards universality-driven modeling of idiomaticity. With respect to previous editions, we extend the annotation scope to all syntactic MWE categories: verbal, nominal, adjectival, adverbial and functional. We cover 17 languages, of which 7 are new. The annotation process is based on cross-lingually unified guidelines, phrased as decision diagrams over linguistic tests, and a typology of 18 MWE categories. The corpus contains almost 5 million tokens, over 250,000 sentences and 140,000 MWE annotations. The applicability of the corpus is tested in baseline experiments with a prompt-based MWE identification system. Results show that generic large language models do not encode sufficient knowledge to solve the MWE identification task.

We describe a Ukrainian-Russian code-switching corpus of Ukrainian Parliamentary Session Transcripts. The corpus includes speeches entirely in Ukrainian, Russian, or various types of mixed speech and allows us to see how speakers switch between these languages depending on the communicative situation. The paper describes the process of creating this corpus from the official multilingual transcripts using automatic language detecting and publicly available metadata on the speakers. On this basis, we consider possible reasons for the change in the number of Ukrainian speakers in the parliament and present the most common patterns of bilingual Ukrainian and Russian code-switching in parliamentarians’ speeches.

This paper describes Slav-NER: the 3rd Multilingual Named Entity Challenge in Slavic languages. The tasks involve recognizing mentions of named entities in Web documents, normalization of the names, and cross-lingual linking. The Challenge covers six languages and five entity types, and is organized as part of the 8th Balto-Slavic Natural Language Processing Workshop, co-located with the EACL 2021 Conference. Ten teams participated in the competition. Performance for the named entity recognition task reached 90% F-measure, much higher than reported in the first edition of the Challenge. Seven teams covered all six languages, and five teams participated in the cross-lingual entity linking task. Detailed valuation information is available on the shared task web page.

Today’s massive news streams demand the automate analysis which is provided by various online news explorers. However, most of them do not provide sentiment analysis. The main problem of sentiment analysis of news is the differences between the writers and readers attitudes to the news text. News can be good or bad but have to be delivered in neutral words as pure facts. Although there are applications for sentiment analysis of news, the task of news analysis is still a very actual problem because the latest news impacts people’s lives daily. In this paper, we explored the problem of sentiment analysis for Ukrainian and Russian news, developed a corpus of Ukrainian and Russian news and annotated each text using one of three categories: positive, negative and neutral. Each text was marked by at least three independent annotators via the web interface, the inter-annotator agreement was analyzed and the final label for each text was computed. These texts were used in the machine learning experiments. Further, we investigated what kinds of named entities such as Locations, Organizations, Persons are perceived as good or bad by the readers and which of them were the cause for text annotation ambiguity.