Agents often repeatedly solve similar task instances from scratch, leading to unnecessary reasoning cost and long execution traces. Prior work has explored workflow reuse and executable skill induction, but it remains unclear which task scenarios admit procedural skills and how the shared procedural structure should be represented across successful traces. We study this problem in FSM-defined scenarios, where successful traces can be viewed as paths through partially observed instance-level transition graphs, and formulate procedural skills as reusable parameterized control-flow subgraphs. Based on this view, we introduce SkillDisCo, a distillation-and-compilation framework that distills reusable PFSM subgraphs from successful traces and compiles them into callable, executable, and verifiable procedural skills. Experiments on ALFWorld and WebArena show that SkillDisCo improves success rates and reduces agent turns across benchmarks and model scales, demonstrating the benefits of representing shared experience as reusable execution structures

High-quality pre-training data is crucial for large language models (LLMs), yet existing score-based selection approaches often fail to balance quality and diversity. Empirical studies have revealed a non-monotonic relationship between dataset scores and downstream performance: simply selecting the top-scored data often leads to performance degradation due to the collapse of correlated evaluation dimensions, which sacrifices diversity. To address this, we propose **O**rthogonal **Di**versity-Aware **S**election (**ODiS**), a novel framework to preserve both quality and diversity by decomposing correlated evaluation metrics into orthogonal feature dimensions. First, ODiS evaluates data from multiple dimensions, covering language quality, knowledge quality, and comprehension difficulty. The resulting multi-dimensional scores are then decorrelated via Principal Component Analysis (PCA), yielding orthogonal evaluation dimensions. For each dimension, a RoBERTa-based scorer is trained to regress the data onto PCA-projected scores, enabling scalable inference on large corpora. Finally, ODiS constructs the training dataset by selecting the top-scored data from each orthogonal dimension, thereby ensuring both quality and diversity. Empirical results show that ODiS-selected data exhibit less than 2% inter-dimension overlap, confirming the orthogonality between dimensions. More importantly, models trained on ODiS-selected data significantly outperform baselines across multiple downstream benchmarks, underscoring the necessity of orthogonal, diversity-aware data selection for LLMs.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has emerged as a promising paradigm for efficiently scaling large language models without a proportional increase in computational cost. However, the standard training strategy of Top-K router prevents MoE models from realizing their full potential for elastic inference. When the number of activated experts is altered at inference time, these models exhibit precipitous performance degradation. In this work, we introduce Matryoshka MoE (M-MoE), a training framework that instills a coarse-to-fine structure directly into the expert ensemble. By systematically varying the number of activated experts during training, M-MoE compels the model to learn a meaningful ranking: top-ranked experts collaborate to provide essential, coarse-grained capabilities, while subsequent experts add progressively finer-grained detail. We explore this principle at multiple granularities, identifying a layer-wise randomization strategy as the most effective. Our experiments demonstrate that a single M-MoE model achieves remarkable elasticity, with its performance at various expert counts closely matching that of an entire suite of specialist models, but at only a fraction of the total training cost. This flexibility not only unlocks elastic inference but also enables optimizing performance by allocating different computational budgets to different model layers. Our work paves the way for more practical and adaptable deployments of large-scale MoE models.

Reliable failure detection and causal reasoning are critical in robotic manipulation, as their absence risks robot damage and endangers human safety.Although recent Vision–Language Models (VLMs) are employed to attempt failure detection and causality reasoning, they typically make retrospective assessment only after task completion, and their reasoning accuracy is often limited.To address these issues, we introduce RoboFailRing, which enables timely failure detection during task execution and enhances the reasoning accuracy of VLMs.It achieves rapid failure detection by retrieving a pre-constructed failure memory and returning a similarity-based decision.In addition, by providing grounded failure report to VLMs, it improves the accuracy of their reasoning about the failure causes and repair strategies.We evaluate RoboFailRing on two large-scale simulated datasets comprising over 6,000 failure trajectories and covering 81 distinct manipulation tasks.The results show that the average success rate of out-of-distribution failure detection reaches 80%, while the mean detection time is cut to roughly 50% of the baseline.Moreover, evaluations on real-world systems show an average 35% gain in VLM failure-reasoning accuracy.We make our code publicly available at: https://github.com/DynamicPoet/RoboFailRing.

Continual pre-training on small-scale task-specific data is an effective method for improving large language models in new target fields, yet it risks catastrophic forgetting of their original capabilities. A common solution is to re-weight training data mixtures from source and target fields on a domain space to achieve balanced performance. Previous domain reweighting strategies rely on manual designation with certain heuristics based on human intuition or empirical results. In this work, we prove that more general heuristics can be parameterized by proposing Data Mixing Agent, the first model-based, end-to-end framework that learns to re-weight domains. The agent learns generalizable heuristics through reinforcement learning on large quantities of data mixing trajectories with corresponding feedback from an evaluation environment. Experiments in continual pre-training on math reasoning show that Data Mixing Agent outperforms strong baselines in achieving balanced performance across source and target field benchmarks. Furthermore, it generalizes well across unseen source fields, target models, and domain spaces without retraining. Direct application to the code generation field also indicates its adaptability across target domains. Further analysis showcases the agents’ well-aligned heuristics with human intuitions and their efficiency in achieving superior model performance with less source-field data.

It is well-known that a diverse corpus is critical for training large language models, which are typically constructed from a mixture of various domains. In general, previous efforts resort to either sampling training data from different domains with static proportions or dynamically adjusting these proportions during training to optimise pretraining performance. However, few methods addressed the complexities of domain-adaptive continual pre-training. To fill this gap, we propose Velocitune, a novel framework that dynamically assesses learning velocity and adjusts data proportions accordingly, favouring slower learning domains while de-emphasising faster learning ones, which is guided by a scaling law to estimate the desired learning goal for each domain with a less associated cost. To evaluate the effectiveness of Velocitune, we conduct experiments on a dataset focused on reasoning tasks with CodeLlama, as well as on a corpus of system commands using Llama3 and Mistral. Velocitune achieves performance gains in both math and code reasoning tasks and command-line generation benchmarks. Further analysis reveals that key factors driving Velocitune’s effectiveness include target estimation and data ordering.

We present NewsBench, a novel evaluation framework to systematically assess the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) for editorial capabilities in Chinese journalism. Our constructed benchmark dataset is focused on four facets of writing proficiency and six facets of safety adherence, and it comprises manually and carefully designed 1,267 test samples in the types of multiple choice questions and short answer questions for five editorial tasks in 24 news domains. To measure performances, we propose different GPT-4 based automatic evaluation protocols to assess LLM generations for short answer questions in terms of writing proficiency and safety adherence, and both are validated by the high correlations with human evaluations. Based on the systematic evaluation framework, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of eleven popular LLMs which can handle Chinese. The experimental results highlight GPT-4 and ERNIE Bot as top performers, yet reveal a relative deficiency in journalistic safety adherence in creative writing tasks. Our findings also underscore the need for enhanced ethical guidance in machine-generated journalistic content, marking a step forward in aligning LLMs with journalistic standards and safety considerations. The evaluation framework and experimental results are expected to provide an in-depth understanding of the editorial capabilities of LLMs and speed up the development of LLMs in journalism.

A better Chinese Grammatical Error Diagnosis (CGED) system for automatic Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) can benefit foreign Chinese learners and lower Chinese learning barriers. In this paper, we introduce our solution to the CGED2020 Shared Task Grammatical Error Correction in detail. The task aims to detect and correct grammatical errors that occur in essays written by foreign Chinese learners. Our solution combined data augmentation methods, spelling check methods, and generative grammatical correction methods, and achieved the best recall score in the Top 1 Correction track. Our final result ranked fourth among the participants.