Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a major public health concern, and large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for support and information-seeking in sensitive domains. We examine whether LLMs perceive relationship abuse differently depending on victim–perpetrator gender configuration. Using 475 Reddit posts from r/relationship_advice, we generate counterfactual variants by swapping gendered identifiers to create four dyads: female–female (F/F), female–male (F/M), male–female (M/F), and male–male (M/M), where the first position denotes the victim. Four recent LLMs (GPT-5o, Gemini 3, Llama 4, and Grok 3) evaluate each variant using a structured questionnaire covering IPV, perpetrator intent, cheating, and abuse subtypes. Results show substantial variation across models and dyads. Abuse and intent detection systematically decrease in mixed-gender dyads where the victim is male, with female perpetrator identity emerging as a consistent negative predictor of abuse recognition. Mixed-effects logistic regression confirms that gender roles significantly shape model outputs. Our findings suggest that LLMs reproduce gendered biases from online training data, with implications for support-related deployment. Code and resources are available at GitHub.

Large language models (LLMs) have transformed machine translation, yet mistranslations, hallucinations, and unnatural phrasing still limit their effectiveness, particularly for low-resource languages. We propose Translation-CoT, a chain-of-thought prompting strategy that breaks translation into structured stages (lexical retrieval, grammatical analysis, and topic identification), followed by a refinement step to improve fluency, tone, and idiomatic expression. We evaluate Translation-CoT across 14 languages from 14 language families and multiple LLMs (GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, LLaMA 3.1, and Gemma 2), with GPT-4o performing best overall, in both English ↔ non-English (X) translation settings. Compared with zero-shot prompting, in-context learning, and existing chain-of-thought prompting methods (Tree-of-Thought (ToT) and Learning-Oriented Prompting (LOT)), Translation-CoT outperforms these prompting strategies on multilingual machine translation across BLEU, ChrF, and METEOR, with especially strong gains in the more difficult English→non-English (X) setting and in low-resource languages. Human evaluation further shows higher preference scores and lower MQM penalty scores, indicating fewer mistranslations, omissions, awkward phrasing, and hallucinations with Translation-CoT. Overall, our results show that structured, task-aware prompting is an effective approach for improving multilingual translation quality and robustness in LLMs.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have tremendous potential to play a key role in supporting mathematical reasoning, with growing use in education and AI research. However, most existing benchmarks are limited to English, creating a significant gap for low-resource languages. For example, Bangla is spoken by nearly 250 million people who would collectively benefit from LLMs capable of native fluency. To address this, we present BanglaMATH, a dataset of 1.7k Bangla math word problems across topics such as Arithmetic, Algebra, Geometry, and Logical Reasoning, sourced from Bangla elementary school workbooks and annotated with details like grade level and number of reasoning steps. We have designed BanglaMATH to evaluate the mathematical capabilities of both commercial and open-source LLMs in Bangla, and we find that Gemini 2.5 Flash and DeepSeek V3 are the only models to achieve strong performance, with ≥ 80% accuracy across three elementary school grades. Furthermore, we assess the robustness and language bias of these top-performing LLMs by augmenting the original problems with distracting information, and translating the problems into English. We show that both LLMs fail to maintain robustness and exhibit significant performance bias in Bangla. Our study underlines current limitations of LLMs in handling arithmetic and mathematical reasoning in low-resource languages, and highlights the need for further research on multilingual and equitable mathematical understanding.

This paper describes HateSense, our multi-task learning framework for the BLP 2025 shared task 1 on Bangla hate speech identification. The task requires not only detecting hate speech but also classifying its type, target, and severity. HateSense integrates binary and multi-label classifiers using both encoder- and decoder-based large language models (LLMs). We experimented with pre-trained encoder models (Bert based models), and decoder models like GPT-4.0, LLaMA 3.1 8B, and Gemma-2 9B. To address challenges such as class imbalance and the linguistic complexity of Bangla, we employed techniques like focal loss and odds ratio preference optimization (ORPO). Experimental results demonstrated that the pre-trained encoders (BanglaBert) achieved state-of-the-art performance. Among different prompting strategies, chain-of-thought (CoT) combined with few-shot prompting proved most effective. Following the HateSense framework, our system attained competitive micro-F1 scores: 0.741 (Task 1A), 0.724 (Task 1B), and 0.7233 (Task 1C). These findings affirm the effectiveness of transformer-based architectures for Bangla hate speech detection and suggest promising avenues for multi-task learning in low-resource languages.