Instruction-tuned LLMs are increasingly converted into reasoning models through post-training to improve multi-step task performance. This conversion is usually optimized for reasoning accuracy, without explicitly preserving the instruction-tuned model’s alignment behavior, such as safe refusal, bias avoidance, and privacy protection. We ask: does this conversion preserve alignment? We study this question through a trustworthiness audit and find that it is not behavior-preserving by default. For a systematic analysis, we compare reasoning models produced via supervised fine-tuning, RL-based post-training, and distillation against matched instruction-tuned baselines across six trustworthiness dimensions: safety, toxicity, stereotyping and bias, machine ethics, privacy, and out-of-distribution robustness. We observe that reasoning models often improve on mathematical reasoning benchmarks but exhibit alignment regressions, including increased toxicity, amplified stereotyping, miscalibrated refusal, and contextual privacy leakage. These regressions are consistent with behavioral drift from the instruction-tuned baseline, measured by KL divergence. Our results show that reasoning-model releases should report trustworthiness metrics alongside capability gains.

Translationese refers to the statistical patterns that distinguish translated texts from original texts, which are often subtle and imperceptible to human readers. When translated texts appear in either training or testing data, these patterns can negatively affect model performance or warp model evaluation. We approach the task of discerning whether a text was originally written in English or translated into English by fine-tuning contemporary foundation models at distinct item lengths and achieve state-of-the-art performance (94% Macro F1). Given that these linguistic cues are subtle and often imperceptible to humans, we analyze the features which enable our model’s high performance. Employing a suite of interpretability-based techniques, we find that: (1) our high accuracy is enabled by a collection of linguistic features, a number of which correspond with linguistic theories of translationese, and (2) pretrained neural models are adept at picking up these features without any fine-tuning.