Our submission presented in this paper is for SemEval-2026 Task 9: Multilingual Text Classification Challenge - Polarization Detection and it covers all three subtasks: (1) binary polarization detection, (2) polarization type classification and (3) polarization manifestation identification. We adopt a systematic approach of research on short designed prompts by considering twelve designed prompts that are different in terminology clarity, detail of the definition, guidance of reasoning and in-context examples use. The experiments are conducted using aya-101 and Gemma3-27B, with the latter chosen for the submission at the end of the development through performance considerations. Our system has an average macro level \textbf{F1-score of 0.762 on Subtask 1, 0.587 on Subtask 2 and 0.444 on Subtask 3} with the average accuracy of 0.819, 0.678 and 0.498, respectively, on the official test set averaged among 22 languages, respectively. With cross-task and cross-lingual analysis, we demonstrate that prompt-based approaches can be used effectively to detect coarse-grained polarization but encounter more and more difficulties as far as fine-grained and multi-label sociolinguistic classification is concerned.

Instruction tuning is now the default way to train and adapt large language models, but many instruction–input–output pairs are only weakly specified: for a given input, the same output can remain plausible under several alternative instructions. This raises a simple question: does the instruction uniquely determine the target output? We propose the Task–Specificity Score (TSS) to quantify how much an instruction matters for predicting the target output by contrasting the true instruction against plausible alternatives for the same input. We further introduce TSS++, which uses hard alternatives and a small quality term to mitigate easy-negative effects. Across three instruction datasets (Alpaca, Dolly-15K, NI-20) and three open LLMs (Gemma, Llama, Qwen), our strongest evidence appears in the tightest budget regime, particularly at 5% retention. In this setting, TSS and TSS++ consistently outperform existing selection baselines across most model–dataset combinations. These results show that task specificity is a useful signal for low-budget instruction-data selection and complements existing filters such as perplexity and IFD.

The NLP community has long advocated for the construction of multi-annotator datasets to better capture the nuances of language interpretation, subjectivity, and ambiguity. This paper conducts a retrospective study to show how performance scores can vary when a dataset expands from a single annotation per instance to multiple annotations. We propose a novel multi-annotator simulation process to generate datasets with varying annotation budgets. We show that similar datasets with the same annotation budget can lead to varying performance gains. Our findings challenge the popular belief that models trained on multi-annotation examples always lead to better performance than models trained on single or few-annotation examples.