Agent skills, which consist of reusable strategies that guide agent reasoning and action, have shown strong potential for improving model capability at inference time. However, current skill construction methods treat the problem as one-shot extraction, overlooking a fundamental tension: a skill tailored to the specific task fails to transfer, while the abstracted skill often provides insufficient guidance. We attribute this fragility to the absence of explicit mechanisms for skill specification and generalization. To address this gap, we introduce SkillComposer, a framework that decomposes skill construction into three learnable operations: create, improve, and merge. Trained via systematic rejection sampling recipe, SkillComposer enables language models to self-evolve skills at inference time and supports three deployment modes: offline for building generalized libraries, online for task-specific refinement, and hybrid for combining both. Comprehensive experiments on -Bench, LiveCodeBench v6, and AppWorld show that SkillComposer consistently outperforms baselines. Our SkillComposer-4B improves a 27B executor by up to +4.5 on agent tasks and +3.4 on code tasks, while generalizing across domains and task types unseen during training. Analysis reveals that merge and improve address orthogonal quality dimensions and that skill composition is a transferable meta-ability, providing a practical recipe for skill-augmented inference.

As large language models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents for long-horizon information-seeking, managing finite context capacity has become a critical bottleneck. Existing context management methods typically commit to a single fixed strategy throughout the entire trajectory. Such static designs may work well in some states, but they cannot adapt as the usefulness and reliability of the accumulated context evolve during long-horizon search. To formalize this challenge, we introduce a probabilistic framework that characterizes long-horizon success through two complementary dimensions: search efficiency and terminal precision. Building on this perspective, we propose AgentSwing, a state-aware adaptive parallel context management routing framework. At each trigger point, AgentSwing expands multiple context-managed branches in parallel and uses lookahead routing to select the most promising continuation. Experiments across diverse benchmarks and agent backbones show that AgentSwing consistently outperforms strong static context management methods, often matching or exceeding their performance with substantially fewer interaction turns while also improving the ultimate performance ceiling of long-horizon web agents. Beyond the empirical gains, the proposed probabilistic framework provides a principled lens for analyzing and designing future context management strategies for long-horizon agents.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for realistic financial analysis over financial documents. However, existing benchmarks fail to capture realistic financial analysis settings that involve cross-document retrieval, multi-page evidence integration, and diverse analytical tasks. To address this gap, we introduce FinMRAGBench, a comprehensive multi-modal financial RAG benchmark in which most questions require retrieving evidence scattered across multiple pages and documents, constructed from large-scale real-world annual reports and comprising 887 expert-verified QA pairs spanning five representative financial analysis tasks. Moreover, we introduce FinMRAGAgent, an agent trained on high-quality agentic trajectories following the reasoning-and-acting (ReAct) paradigm, capable of dynamic tool invocation and multi-step financial analysis. Our extensive experiments show that current multi-modal RAG systems still struggle with incomplete retrieval and complex financial reasoning. In contrast, FinMRAGAgent achieves the strongest overall performance across all models, demonstrating that our structured reasoning approach significantly enhances multi-modal RAG in realistic financial scenarios. The code and data are available at https://github.com/sqyangit/FinMRAGBench.

With the rapid progress of large language models (LLMs), aligning a general-purpose model with downstream tasks through fine-tuning has become a central research focus. Selecting only high-quality examples for training has been shown to be one of the most effective ways to improve fine-tuning performance. However, prior work concentrates almost exclusively on data preprocessing: filtering and cleaning data before training begins. While the order and composition of training data during training have received little fine-grained attention. To fill this gap, our work proposed Fine-Grained Order Fine-Tuning, a fine-grained scheduling method of data order in epochs. Drawing on curriculum-learning principles, FOT defines data difficulty based on the relevance between the data and the model, and then performs dynamic scheduling of the training order in each epoch according to the difficulty. On both large-scale continued pre-training and small-scale supervised fine-tuning experiments, FOT has achieved an average 2.4% improvement over baselines. Our study offers a new perspective on data governance in the fine-tuning phase.

Recent advances in persona-centric memory demonstrate the promise of multi-agent systems for managing persona memory, especially in conversational scenarios. However, their complex pipelines often incur information loss and poor cross-scenario robustness, leading to suboptimal performance. In this paper, we propose DeltaMem, an agentic memory management system that formulates persona-centric memory management as an end-to-end task within a single-agent setting. To further improve the performance of our agentic memory manager, we draw inspiration from the evolution of human memory and synthesize a user-assistant dialogue dataset along with corresponding operation-level memory updating labels. Building on this, we introduce a novel Memory-based Levenshtein Distance to formalize the memory updating reward, and propose a tailored reinforcement learning framework to further enhance the management capabilities of DeltaMem. Extensive experiments show that both training-free and RL-trained DeltaMem outperform all product-level baselines across diverse long-term memory benchmarks, including LoCoMo, HaluMem, and PersonaMem.

Tabular data is widely used in fields such as finance and healthcare. Traditional tree-based models are prevalent for tabular prediction tasks due to their ability to handle heterogeneous features. However, their heavy reliance on feature engineering limits both their generalizability and their human-readable interpretability. On the other hand, Large Language Models (LLMs) naturally provide intermediate reasoning steps, thus offering greater transparency in decision-making. Nevertheless, LLMs often fail to match the predictive performance of tree-based models on tabular data. To address these challenges, we propose a novel Logic-Graph-Enhanced LLM Reasoning (LogGER) framework that integrates the strengths of tree-based models and LLMs. Specifically, we reformulate the traditional decision tree as a human-readable logic graph, which explicitly models the causal relationships between features and targets. This logic graph is automatically constructed using LLMs based on data priors and serves as the foundation for LogGER. To fully leverage the logic graph, we further introduce a logic-graph-guided process supervision approach, which evaluates and enhances the quality of LLM’s intermediate reasoning steps using logic-graph-aided process reward. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LogGER consistently outperforms both tree-based models and state-of-the-art LLM methods on a variety of tabular prediction tasks, achieving superior accuracy and interpretability.

Aligning general-purpose large language models (LLMs) to downstream tasks often incurs significant training adjustment costs. Prior research has explored various avenues to enhance alignment efficiency, primarily through minimal-data training or data-driven activations to identify key attention heads. However, these approaches inherently introduce data dependency, which hinders generalization and reusability. To address this issue and enhance model alignment efficiency, we propose the Attention Localization and Pruning Strategy ALPS, an efficient algorithm that localizes the most task-sensitive attention heads and prunes by restricting attention training updates to these heads, thereby reducing alignment costs. Experimental results demonstrate that our method activates only 10% of attention parameters during fine-tuning while achieving a 2% performance improvement over baselines on three tasks. Moreover, the identified task-specific heads are transferable across datasets and mitigate knowledge forgetting. Our work and findings provide a novel perspective on efficient LLM alignment.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in reasoning with the emergence of reasoning models like OpenAI-o1 and DeepSeek-R1. Recent research focuses on integrating reasoning capabilities into the realm of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) via outcome-supervised reinforcement learning (RL) approaches, while the correctness of intermediate think-and-search steps is usually neglected. To address this issue, we design a process-level reward module to mitigate the unawareness of intermediate reasoning steps in outcome-level supervision without additional annotation. Grounded on this, we propose Learning to Think-and-Search (LeTS), a novel framework that hybridizes stepwise process reward and outcome-based reward to current RL methods for RAG. Extensive experiments demonstrate the generalization and inference efficiency of LeTS across various RAG benchmarks. In addition, these results reveal the potential of process- and outcome-level reward hybridization in boosting LLMs’ reasoning ability via RL under other scenarios.

In-context learning (ICL) has demonstrated significant potential in enhancing the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) during inference. It’s well-established that ICL heavily relies on selecting effective demonstrations to achieve outputs that better align with the expected results. As for demonstration selection, previous approaches have typically relied on intuitive metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of demonstrations, which often results in limited robustness and poor cross-model generalization capabilities. To tackle these challenges, we propose a novel method, Demonstration Validation (D.Va), which integrates a demonstration validation perspective into this field. By introducing the demonstration validation mechanism, our method effectively identifies demonstrations that are both effective and highly generalizable. D.Va surpasses all existing retrieval-based in-context learning techniques across both natural language understanding (NLU) and natural language generation (NLG) tasks. Additionally, we demonstrate the robustness and generalizability of our approach across various language models and retrieval models.

In the current landscape of large language models (LLMs), the process of instruction tuning serves as an essential step. Considering the high computing power overhead, data-efficient instruction tuning was proposed to reduce the training data size in this process, aiming at selecting high-quality instructional data. Nevertheless, we argue that most current data-efficient instruction-tuning methods are highly dependent on the quality of the original instruction-tuning dataset. When it comes to datasets synthesized by LLMs, a common scenario in this field, dirty samples will even be selected with a higher probability than other samples. To address these challenges, we utilized external knowledge (relevant examples or paragraphs) to evaluate those samples synthesized by LLMs with an in-context-based relative predictive entropy. Based on the new metric, we proposed a framework, dubbed as RECOST, which integrates external-knowledge-base re-ranking and diversity-consistent sampling into a single pipeline. Through extensive experiments on several synthetic datasets (Alpaca and Alpaca-gpt4), we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method and achieve even better results with only 1% of the full dataset.