In the legal domain, LLMs can improve reliability and interpretability by generating explicit reasoning traces. However, training LLMs to produce high-quality reasoning traces remains challenging. Existing supervised fine-tuning methods struggle when reasoning traces are significantly longer than final answers, as the learning signal for the answer becomes diluted. Meanwhile, reinforcement learning methods such as Group Relative Policy Optimization also have several limitations, including costly reward design, performance plateaus, and reward hacking. We therefore propose a two-stage training framework. In Stage I, JurisCoT-SFT employs a length-normalized dual objective to balance learning signals between reasoning traces and final answers. In Stage II, Lifecycle-Aware Backtrackable Policy Optimization dynamically evaluates and retires auxiliary reward signals based on their impact on final evaluation objectives, enabling efficient reward utilization. Our framework substantially improves legal reasoning performance on relevant tasks selected from multiple legal benchmarks, including ChJGBench, LawBench, and LegalBench. Experimental results demonstrate consistent improvements in both reasoning trace quality and final answer accuracy, while our models remain competitive with larger models.

With the rapid development of LLMs, increasing attention has been paid to whether they can reliably generate complete and legally valid judicial documents. This calls for a benchmark capable of evaluating whether models can accurately apply statutes and resolve outcome-critical issues, including claims, charges, penalties, and monetary obligations. However, existing benchmarks typically focus on isolated legal tasks or coarse-grained evaluation. We introduce ChJGBench, a benchmark for generating the reasoning and dispositive sections of Chinese judgments across civil, criminal, and administrative cases. Built from 3,462 real-world judgments, ChJGBench provides a case-type-aware diagnostic evaluation framework comprising 13 metric types and adopts a hybrid paradigm. Experiments reveal no uniform advantage for legal-domain models over general-purpose models, with model strengths varying across diagnostic dimensions. Performance is generally stronger on criminal cases, while civil and administrative cases continue to present substantial challenges.

Visual Relation Extraction (VRE) is a powerful means of discovering relationships between entities within visually-rich documents. Existing methods often focus on manipulating entity features to find pairwise relations, yet neglect the more fundamental structural information that links disparate entity pairs together. The absence of global structure information may make the model struggle to learn long-range relations and easily predict conflicted results. To alleviate such limitations, we propose a GlObal Structure knowledge-guided relation Extraction (GOSE) framework. GOSE initiates by generating preliminary relation predictions on entity pairs extracted from a scanned image of the document. Subsequently, global structural knowledge is captured from the preceding iterative predictions, which are then incorporated into the representations of the entities. This “generate-capture-incorporate” cycle is repeated multiple times, allowing entity representations and global structure knowledge to be mutually reinforced. Extensive experiments validate that GOSE not only outperforms existing methods in the standard fine-tuning setting but also reveals superior cross-lingual learning capabilities; indeed, even yields stronger data-efficient performance in the low-resource setting.