Large language model (LLM) safety has received extensive attention since LLMs are vulnerable to manipulation. To understand and mitigate the risk, this paper studies the problem of jailbreak attacks on LLMs, which aim to deliberately break the safety guard of LLMs for harmful or unethical responses. Current black-box jailbreak attacks are limited by either a reliance on human expertise for manual prompt design or by intricate workflows in automated approaches. Towards this end, we propose a novel approach named Reward-guided Meta-prompt Evolving with reflection (ROOT) for automatic jailbreak attack generation. The core idea of our ROOT is to optimize a meta-prompt using attack rewards as jailbreak guidance. In particular, our ROOT feeds a meta-prompt with toxic questions into LLMs to generate prompts for jailbreak attempts. The responses from these attempts are further evaluated using a judge model, which further summarizes the reflection of both successful and unsuccessful jailbreak attempts into different meta-prompt optimization strategies. To reduce the noise, we estimate their reward scores to select high-quality strategies, which can optimize our meta-prompt for better attack generation ability. Extensive experiments show that ROOT demonstrates strong generalizability and broad adaptability by achieving high jailbreak success rates (above 90%) across both multiple LLMs and various categories of harmful tasks.

Scientific literature question answering is a pivotal step towards new scientific discoveries. Recently, two-stage retrieval-augmented generated large language models (RAG-LLMs) have shown impressive advancements in this domain. Such a two-stage framework, especially the second stage (reranker), is particularly essential in the scientific domain, where subtle differences in terminology may have a greatly negative impact on the final factual-oriented or knowledge-intensive answers. Despite this significant progress, the potential and limitations of these works remain unexplored. In this work, we present a Scientific Rerank-oriented RAG Benchmark (SciRerankBench), for evaluating rerankers within RAG-LLMs systems, spanning five scientific subjects. To rigorously assess the reranker performance in terms of noise resilience, relevance disambiguation, and factual consistency, we develop three types of question-context-answer (Q-C-A) pairs, i.e., Noisy Contexts (NC), Semantically Similar but Logically Irrelevant Contexts (SSLI), and Counterfactual Contexts (CC). Through systematic evaluation of 13 widely used rerankers on five families of LLMs, we provide detailed insights into their relative strengths and limitations. To the best of our knowledge, SciRerankBench is the first benchmark specifically developed to evaluate rerankers within RAG-LLMs, which provides valuable observations and guidance for their future development.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and text-aware graph learning have increased interest in reasoning over text-attributed graphs(TAGs). In many real-world settings, such graphs are inherently heterogeneous, with most existing benchmarks remaining largely homogeneous in structure. As a result, the lack of large-scale benchmarks for heterogeneous text-attributed graphs has hindered systematic evaluation and fair comparison of existing methods. In this work, we introduce CITE - Catalytic Information Textual Entities Graph, the first and largest heterogeneous text-attributed citation graph benchmark for catalytic materials. CITE contains over 438K nodes and 1.2M edges spanning four node types and four relation types, with rich node-level textual information. We establish standardized evaluation protocols for node classification and link prediction, and conduct ablation studies to assess the impact of graph heterogeneity and textual attributes. Using CITE, we benchmark four classes of learning paradigms, including homogeneous graph models, heterogeneous graph models, LLM-centric models, and hybrid LLM–graph models. By providing a large-scale heterogeneous text-attributed benchmark together with standardized evaluation protocols and comprehensive baselines, CITE enables systematic assessment across diverse modeling paradigms and offers new insights into text-aware and LLM-enhanced graph learning. The dataset, codebase and evaluation suite are publicly available.

Multi-modal intent recognition (MIR) requires integrating non-verbal cues from real-world contexts to enhance human intention understanding, which has attracted substantial research attention in recent years. Despite promising advancements, a comprehensive survey summarizing recent advances and new frontiers remains absent. To this end, we present a thorough and unified review of MIR, covering different aspects including (1) Extensive survey: we take the first step to present a thorough survey of this research field covering textual, visual (image/video), and acoustic signals. (2) Unified taxonomy: we provide a unified framework including evaluation protocol and advanced methods to summarize the current progress in MIR. (3) Emerging frontiers: We discuss some future directions such as multi-task, multi-domain, and multi-lingual MIR, and give our thoughts respectively. (4) Abundant resources: we collect abundant open-source resources, including relevant papers, data corpora, and leaderboards. We hope this survey can shed light on future research in MIR.

Hallucination has emerged as a critical challenge for large language models (LLMs) and large vision-language models (LVLMs), particularly in high-stakes medical applications. Despite its significance, dedicated research on medical hallucination remains unexplored. In this survey, we first provide a unified perspective on medical hallucination for both LLMs and LVLMs, and delve into its causes. Subsequently, we review recent advancements in detecting, evaluating, and mitigating medical hallucinations, offering a comprehensive overview of evaluation benchmarks, metrics, and strategies developed to tackle this issue. Moreover, we delineate the current challenges and delve into new frontiers, thereby shedding light on future research. We hope this work coupled with open-source resources can provide the community with quick access and spur breakthrough research in medical hallucination.