Qingyi Wang
Author directory2026
FaithLens: Detecting and Explaining Faithfulness Hallucination
Shuzheng Si | Qingyi Wang | Haozhe Zhao | Yuzhuo Bai | Guanqiao Chen | Kangyang Luo | Gang Chen | Fanchao Qi | Minjia Zhang | Baobao Chang | Maosong Sun
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Shuzheng Si | Qingyi Wang | Haozhe Zhao | Yuzhuo Bai | Guanqiao Chen | Kangyang Luo | Gang Chen | Fanchao Qi | Minjia Zhang | Baobao Chang | Maosong Sun
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Recognizing whether outputs from large language models (LLMs) contain faithfulness hallucination is crucial for real-world applications, e.g., retrieval-augmented generation and summarization. In this paper, we introduce FaithLens, a cost-efficient and effective faithfulness hallucination detection model that can jointly provide binary predictions and corresponding explanations to improve trustworthiness. To achieve this, we first synthesize training data with explanations via advanced LLMs and apply a well-defined data filtering strategy to ensure label correctness, explanation quality, and data diversity. Subsequently, we fine-tune the model on these well-curated training data as a cold start and further optimize it with rule-based reinforcement learning, using rewards for both prediction correctness and explanation quality. Results on 12 diverse tasks show that the 8B-parameter FaithLens outperforms advanced models such as GPT-5.2 and o3. Also, FaithLens can produce high-quality explanations, delivering a distinctive balance of trustworthiness, efficiency, and effectiveness.
InFi-Check: Interpretable and Fine-Grained Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documents
Yuzhuo Bai | Shuzheng Si | Kangyang Luo | Qingyi Wang | Wenhao Li | Gang Chen | Fanchao Qi | Maosong Sun
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Yuzhuo Bai | Shuzheng Si | Kangyang Luo | Qingyi Wang | Wenhao Li | Gang Chen | Fanchao Qi | Maosong Sun
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Large language models (LLMs) often hallucinate, yet most existing fact-checking methods treat factuality evaluation as a binary classification problem, offering limited interpretability and failing to capture fine-grained error types. In this paper, we introduce InFi-Check, a framework for interpretable and fine-grained fact-checking of LLM outputs. Specifically, we first propose a controlled data synthesis pipeline that generates high-quality data featuring explicit evidence, fine-grained error type labels, justifications, and corrections. Based on this, we construct large-scale training data and a manually verified benchmark InFi-Check-FG for fine-grained fact-checking of LLM outputs. Building on these high-quality training data, we further propose InFi-Checker, which can jointly provide supporting evidence, classify fine-grained error types, and produce justifications along with corrections. Experiments show that InFi-Checker achieves state-of-the-art performance on InFi-Check-FG and strong generalization across various downstream tasks, significantly improving the utility and trustworthiness of factuality evaluation.