The Mutual Reinforcement Effect (MRE) describes a phenomenon in information extraction where word-level and sentence-level tasks can mutually improve each other when jointly modeled. While prior work has reported MRE in Japanese, its generality across languages and task settings has not been empirically validated, largely due to the lack of multilingual MRE datasets. To address this limitation, we introduce the Multilingual MRE Mix dataset (MMM), which consists of 21 sub-datasets covering English, Japanese, and Chinese. We propose an LLM-assisted dataset translation and alignment framework that significantly reduces manual annotation effort while preserving the structural requirements of MRE tasks. Building on MMM, we adopt a unified input-output framework to train an open-domain information extraction model and conduct extensive empirical studies, including full fine-tuning ablations and the construction of knowledgeable verbalizers based on MRE-mix data. Experimental results show that 76 percent of the MMM sub-datasets consistently exhibit the Mutual Reinforcement Effect across languages. These findings provide systematic empirical validation of MRE in multilingual settings and demonstrate its practical value for information extraction.

Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success through step-by-step chains of thought, yet they often suffer from excessive redundancy or unfaithful reasoning. Existing methods for shaping LRM behavior typically rely on reinforcement learning or fine-tuning with gold-standard reasoning traces, a paradigm that is both computationally expensive and difficult to scale. In this paper, we reveal that LRMs possess latent reasoning beliefs that internally track their own reasoning traits, which can be captured through simple logit probing without specialized training. Building on this insight, we propose Reasoning Belief Engineering (RELIEF), a simple yet effective framework that shapes LRM behavior by aligning the model’s self-concept with a target belief blueprint. Crucially, RELIEF completely bypasses the need for reasoning-trace supervision. It internalizes desired traits by fine-tuning on synthesized, self-reflective QA pairs that affirm the target belief. Extensive experiments on efficiency and faithfulness tasks demonstrate that RELIEF matches or outperforms behavior-supervised and preference-based baselines while requiring significantly lower training costs. Our analysis further validates that shifting a model’s reasoning belief effectively shapes its actual behavior.

Currently, most multimodal studies are based on large language models (LLMs) with quadratic-complexity Transformer architectures. While linear models like RNNs enjoy low inference costs, their application has been largely limited to the text-only modality. This work explores the capabilities of modern RNN architectures in multimodal contexts. We propose ModRWKV—a decoupled multimodal framework built upon the RWKV7 architecture as its LLM backbone—which achieves multi-source information fusion through dynamically adaptable heterogeneous modality encoders. We designed the multimodal modules in ModRWKV with an extremely lightweight architecture and, through extensive experiments, identified a configuration that achieves an optimal balance between performance and computational efficiency. ModRWKV leverages the pretrained weights of the RWKV7 LLM for initialization, which significantly accelerates multimodal training. Comparative experiments with different pretrained checkpoints further demonstrate that such initialization plays a crucial role in enhancing the model’s ability to understand multimodal signals. Supported by extensive experiments, we conclude that modern RNN architectures present a viable alternative to Transformers in the domain of multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Furthermore, we identify the optimal configuration of the ModRWKV architecture through systematic exploration.

The safety alignment of large language models (LLMs) remains vulnerable, as their initial behavior can be easily jailbroken by even relatively simple attacks. Since infilling a fixed template between the input instruction and initial model output is a common practice for existing LLMs, we hypothesize that this template is a key factor behind their vulnerabilities: LLMs’ safety-related decision-making overly relies on the aggregated information from the template region, which largely influences these models’ safety behavior. We refer to this issue as template-anchored safety alignment. In this paper, we conduct extensive experiments and verify that template-anchored safety alignment is widespread across various aligned LLMs. Our mechanistic analyses demonstrate how it leads to models’ susceptibility when encountering inference-time jailbreak attacks. Furthermore, we show that detaching safety mechanisms from the template region is promising in mitigating vulnerabilities to jailbreak attacks. We encourage future research to develop more robust safety alignment techniques that reduce reliance on the template region.