This study aims to test and evaluate the capabilities and characteristics of current mainstream Visual Language Models (VLMs) in generating critiques for traditional Chinese painting. To achieve this, we first developed a quantitative framework for Chinese painting critique. This framework was constructed by extracting multi-dimensional evaluative features covering evaluative stance, feature focus, and commentary quality from human expert critiques using a zero-shot classification model. Based on these features, several representative critic personas were defined and quantified. This framework was then employed to evaluate selected VLMs such as Llama, Qwen, or Gemini. The experimental design involved persona-guided prompting to assess the VLM’s ability to generate critiques from diverse perspectives. Our findings reveal the current performance levels, strengths, and areas for improvement of VLMs in the domain of art critique, offering insights into their potential and limitations in complex semantic understanding and content generation tasks.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often appearculturally competent but rely on superficial pat.tern matching rather than genuine cultural understanding. We introduce a diagnostic framework to probe VLM reasoning on fire-themedcultural imagery through both classification andexplanation analysis. Testing multiple modelson Western festivals, non-Western traditions.and emergency scenes reveals systematic biases: models correctly identify prominent Western festivals but struggle with underrepresentedcultural events, frequently offering vague labelsor dangerously misclassifying emergencies ascelebrations. These failures expose the risksof symbolic shortcuts and highlight the needfor cultural evaluation beyond accuracy metrics to ensure interpretable and fair multimodalsystems.