We introduce Omnilingual MT, a family of multilingual translation (MT) systems covering more than 1,600 languages—the broadest benchmarked coverage of any MT system to date. We make contributions in several key research questions in the field: strategies for the use of monolingual data, curating seed training data, tokenization and suitable architectures, the competitiveness of small specialized MT models as opposed to general purpose large models, and evaluation protocols. Our data strategy combines large-scale multilingual corpora with backtranslation for 2,000+ languages and MeDLEy, a grammatically-diverse seed dataset for 109 low-resource languages. We explore two complementary architectures: OMT-LLAMA, a decoder-only model (1B/3B/8B) built on LLAMA3 with multilingual continual pretraining, and OMT-NLLB, a 3B encoder-decoder model with a novel three-stage training strategy exploiting non-parallel data via autoencoding. For evaluation, we extend the BOUQuET benchmark to 275 languages, develop Met-BOUQuET with human annotations of machine quality in 161 directions, and BLASER 3, a reference-free quality estimation metric. Our specialized 1B–8B models match or exceed 70B general-purpose LLMs, demonstrating that specialization is a more reliable path to multilingual translation than scale alone. Omnilingual MT achieves “passable” translation quality as judged by human annotators for over 440 languages, doubling it over the previous state of the field at ∼200 languages, and translates in zero-shot mode into ∼1,200 languages versus 300–400 for the baselines. With Omnilingual MT, we showcase a path encompassing the full pipeline of data and system development towards designing models that are multilingual from the onset.

Human infants, with only a few hundred hours of speech exposure, acquire basic units of new languages, highlighting a striking efficiency gap compared to the data-hungry self-supervised speech models. To address this gap, this paper introduces SpidR-Adapt for rapid adaptation of speech units to new languages using minimal unlabeled data. We cast such low-resource speech representation learning as a meta-learning problem and construct a multi-task adaptive pre-training (MAdaPT) protocol which formulates the adaptation process as a bi-level optimization framework. To enable scalable meta-training under this framework, we propose a novel heuristic solution, first-order bi-level optimization (FOBLO), avoiding heavy computation costs. Finally, we stabilize meta-training by using a robust initialization through interleaved supervision which alternates self-supervised and supervised objectives. Empirically, SpidR-Adapt achieves rapid gains in phonemic discriminability (ABX) and downstream spoken language modeling scores (sWUGGY, sBLIMP, tSC), surpassing in-domain toplines after training on less than 1h of target-language audio and delivering 100× greater data efficiency than standard multi-task training.. These findings highlight a practical, architecture-agnostic path toward biologically inspired, data-efficient representations. We open-source the training code and model checkpoints at https://github.com/facebookresearch/spidr-adapt.

Children learn to speak with a low amount of data and can be taught new words on a few-shot basis, making them particularly data-efficient learners. The BabyLM challenge aims at exploring language model (LM) training in the low-data regime but uses metrics that concentrate on the head of the word distribution. Here, we introduce LongTail-Swap (LT-Swap), a benchmark that focuses on the tail of the distribution, i.e., measures the ability of LMs to learn new words with very little exposure, like infants do. LT-Swap is a pretraining corpus-specific test set of acceptable versus unacceptable sentence pairs that isolate semantic and syntactic usage of rare words. Models are evaluated in a zero-shot fashion by computing the average log probabilities over the two members of each pair.We built two such test sets associated with the 10M words and 100M words BabyLM training sets, respectively, and evaluated 16 models from the BabyLM leaderboard. Our results not only highlight the poor performance of language models on rare words but also reveal that performance differences across LM architectures are much more pronounced in the long tail than in the head. This offers new insights into which architectures are better at handling rare word generalization. We’ve also made the code publicly available on GitHub, enabling the generation of LT-Swap benchmarks based on any English text corpus.