Rasika Chakravarthy
Author directory2026
Office Comprehension Benchmark
Firoz Shaik | Mateus Picanço Lima Gomes | Md Tanvir Islam Aumi | Jingci Wang | Milos Milunovic | Ivana Jovanovic | Jay Rathi | Vishwas Suryanarayanan | Neha Nandan Kenkare | Weiyao Xie | Zhipeng Han | Zheng Zhang | Waleed Shahid | Thong Q. Nguyen | Michael Bentley | Tamara Stankovic | Rasika Chakravarthy | Vishal Chowdhary
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Firoz Shaik | Mateus Picanço Lima Gomes | Md Tanvir Islam Aumi | Jingci Wang | Milos Milunovic | Ivana Jovanovic | Jay Rathi | Vishwas Suryanarayanan | Neha Nandan Kenkare | Weiyao Xie | Zhipeng Han | Zheng Zhang | Waleed Shahid | Thong Q. Nguyen | Michael Bentley | Tamara Stankovic | Rasika Chakravarthy | Vishal Chowdhary
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
We introduce Office Comprehension Bench (OCB), the first public benchmark to jointly evaluate LLM systems on Word, Excel, and PowerPoint comprehension over native file formats (.docx, .xlsx, .pptx) and their variants. OCB consists of two tracks. File Fidelity Q A tests structural and visual perception of office artifacts — tables, charts, embedded images, formulas, and app-specific elements such as headers, speaker notes, and named ranges. Domain Q A tests expert-level reasoning grounded in real-world industry documents across 12 professional domains, with queries requiring multi-step analysis and synthesis across documents. Each reference answer is decomposed into atomic, binary-gradable claims, and an ensemble of LLM judges scores responses against each claim independently. Even the strongest frontier system in its default reasoning mode reaches only ~59.3% on Domain Q A; increasing thinking depth within a tier does not move performance materially, while moving to a higher product tier yields modest gains. We release the dataset, evaluation tooling, judge prompt, and a public leaderboard.
2023
InstructExcel: A Benchmark for Natural Language Instruction in Excel
Justin Payan | Swaroop Mishra | Mukul Singh | Carina Negreanu | Christian Poelitz | Chitta Baral | Subhro Roy | Rasika Chakravarthy | Benjamin Van Durme | Elnaz Nouri
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023
Justin Payan | Swaroop Mishra | Mukul Singh | Carina Negreanu | Christian Poelitz | Chitta Baral | Subhro Roy | Rasika Chakravarthy | Benjamin Van Durme | Elnaz Nouri
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023
With the evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) we can solve increasingly more complex NLP tasks across various domains, including spreadsheets. This work investigates whether LLMs can generate code (Excel OfficeScripts, a TypeScript API for executing many tasks in Excel) that solves Excel specific tasks provided via natural language user instructions. To do so we introduce a new large-scale benchmark, InstructExcel, created by leveraging the ‘Automate’ feature in Excel to automatically generate OfficeScripts from users’ actions. Our benchmark includes over 10k samples covering 170+ Excel operations across 2,000 publicly available Excel spreadsheets. Experiments across various zero-shot and few-shot settings show that InstructExcel is a hard benchmark for state of the art models like GPT-4. We observe that (1) using GPT-4 over GPT-3.5, (2) providing more in-context examples, and (3) dynamic prompting can help improve performance on this benchmark.
Search
Fix author
Co-authors
- Md Tanvir Islam Aumi 1
- Chitta Baral 1
- Michael Bentley 1
- Vishal Chowdhary 1
- Mateus Picanço Lima Gomes 1
- Zhipeng Han 1
- Ivana Jovanovic 1
- Neha Nandan Kenkare 1
- Milos Milunovic 1
- Swaroop Mishra 1
- Carina Negreanu 1
- Thong Q. Nguyen 1
- Elnaz Nouri 1
- Justin Payan 1
- Christian Poelitz 1
- Jay Rathi 1
- Subhro Roy 1
- Waleed Shahid 1
- Firoz Shaik 1
- Mukul Singh 1
- Tamara Stankovic 1
- Vishwas Suryanarayanan 1
- Benjamin Van Durme 1
- Jingci Wang 1
- Weiyao Xie 1
- Zheng Zhang 1